From: Colin_Higbie <CHigbie1@Higbie.name>
To: "starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Starlink] Re: Starlink and Iran
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:42:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN7PPF7A8514BAD6D98F35317C8804B6485F18CA@BN7PPF7A8514BAD.namprd16.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <176849731431.1249.14387618908540773471@gauss>
Can't the traditional approach of just flooding the air with noise reduce the SNR to the point that most packets are indecipherable? I don't believe this requires a digital or technically advanced approach nor a focus on GPS or anything else so specific, just sufficient power and ability to broadcast fully across the same spectrum bands to drown out the valid signals. Starlink, like cellular technology, uses excellent methods to operate amidst a lot of noise and find its packets, but it's still not immune to noise.
Iran is a large area, and probably the government lacks the ability to block the entire nation simultaneously, but I would think they could drown out the signal in specific geographic regions, effectively jamming the signal entirely or almost entirely in those areas.
Perhaps some of the cellular or satcom experts here can expand on or correct me if I'm mistaken. My physics knowledge on this has not updated much since the original spread spectrum work decades ago.
Cheers,
Colin
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-15 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <176849731431.1249.14387618908540773471@gauss>
2026-01-15 17:42 ` Colin_Higbie [this message]
2026-01-15 18:56 ` [Starlink] Re: Starlink and Iran Jim Forster
2026-01-15 20:15 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-15 20:27 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-15 20:30 ` Hayden Simon
2026-01-15 21:06 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-15 21:09 ` Hayden Simon
2026-01-15 21:20 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-15 21:23 ` Hayden Simon
[not found] <176851123059.1249.8585659892308012167@gauss>
2026-01-15 21:49 ` Colin_Higbie
2026-01-15 23:15 ` Frantisek Borsik
2026-01-16 0:13 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-16 1:29 ` David Lang
2026-01-16 22:55 ` Frantisek Borsik
2026-01-16 23:06 ` J Pan
[not found] ` <13187.1768590201@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
2026-01-16 23:30 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-17 0:07 ` David Lang
2026-01-17 21:56 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-19 20:39 ` David Lang
2026-01-28 3:09 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-28 3:30 ` David Lang
2026-01-28 4:02 ` Mike Puchol
2026-01-28 9:05 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-28 9:53 ` David Lang
2026-01-28 20:43 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-28 20:55 ` David Lang
2026-01-17 18:32 ` Michael Richardson
2026-01-17 18:38 ` Inemesit Affia
2026-01-17 19:25 ` Michael Richardson
2026-01-17 22:12 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-15 14:50 David Fernández
2026-01-15 16:11 ` Oleg Kutkov
2026-01-15 17:13 ` J Pan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-15 9:51 [Starlink] " Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-15 10:06 ` [Starlink] " Inemesit Affia
2026-01-15 10:30 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-15 10:44 ` Inemesit Affia
2026-01-15 11:16 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-15 10:32 ` Inemesit Affia
2026-01-15 10:51 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-15 11:17 ` David Lang
2026-01-15 11:59 ` Sauli Kiviranta
2026-01-15 14:08 ` David Lang
2026-01-15 15:29 ` Sauli Kiviranta
[not found] ` <3af2ac06-e098-4c79-869d-9c389959ca07@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <q9304244-661o-3qsr-o6rp-9q1nqq09r419@ynat.uz>
[not found] ` <4ba64a41-bbbf-4fb5-adb0-c77c15e4ca0f@gmail.com>
2026-01-15 16:20 ` Inemesit Affia
2026-01-15 20:12 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-15 17:10 ` J Pan
2026-01-15 20:07 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-15 21:47 ` Oleg Kutkov
2026-01-16 4:18 ` Ulrich Speidel
2026-01-16 8:12 ` Frantisek Borsik
2026-01-16 8:24 ` Inemesit Affia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BN7PPF7A8514BAD6D98F35317C8804B6485F18CA@BN7PPF7A8514BAD.namprd16.prod.outlook.com \
--to=chigbie1@higbie.name \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox