Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Colin_Higbie <CHigbie1@Higbie.name>
To: "starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Starlink] Re: Starlink Standby Mode
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 18:41:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN7PPF7A8514BADE730032D2BBC932445E2F10FA@BN7PPF7A8514BAD.namprd16.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <175739769285.1561.9299932820839760282@gauss>

I find the Standby mode to be a great backup option. $5/mo for unlimited low-bandwidth usage. This is something I've been urging them to offer for about a year now.

About 18 months after I originally purchased and subscribed to Starlink, our power company (not phone company as you'd expect, really our electric power company) rolled out fiber to rural communities in northern NH. As great as Starlink was compared to what we had before, fiber is even better now that it's available (1Gbps for $79/mo, consistently tests as A on Bufferbloat). But it's not 100% reliable. For example, when there are widespread power outages, it goes down. The Starlink standby option is perfect for those situations.

Latency remains decent, just limited bandwidth. And if the fiber outage remains in effect for too long, we could always activate Starlink at full bandwidth for that month, where it appears they're taking that option away from people with inactive accounts not already on Standby mode (they may be bluffing on that – you'd think they would want to make it easy for anyone to give them money and resubscribe, standby customer or not). 

Cheers,
Colin

       reply	other threads:[~2025-09-09 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <175739769285.1561.9299932820839760282@gauss>
2025-09-09 18:41 ` Colin_Higbie [this message]
2025-09-09 20:14   ` Luis A. Cornejo
2025-09-09 21:01     ` Oleg Kutkov
2025-09-09 21:20       ` J Pan
2025-09-10  5:36         ` Ulrich Speidel
2025-09-10  6:00           ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-09-10  7:53           ` David Lang
2025-09-10 10:24             ` Ulrich Speidel
2025-09-10 16:01               ` J Pan
2025-09-08 21:34 [Starlink] " Luis A. Cornejo
2025-09-09  5:35 ` [Starlink] " J Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BN7PPF7A8514BADE730032D2BBC932445E2F10FA@BN7PPF7A8514BAD.namprd16.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=chigbie1@higbie.name \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox