Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Press <lpress@csudh.edu>
To: "starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	Mike Puchol <mike@starlink.sx>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] orbital maneuvers 12 per sat in the last 6 months
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2023 13:53:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR03MB3863736130669024CFE6B9CDC232A@BYAPR03MB3863.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10631502-b340-4e11-a0cd-ce47f673d63b@Spark>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3617 bytes --]

A little more on LeoLabs:

https://circleid.com/posts/20201108-satellite-and-space-debris-tracking-as-a-service

Larry

________________________________
From: Starlink <starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> on behalf of Mike Puchol via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 6:18 AM
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] orbital maneuvers 12 per sat in the last 6 months

The instruments are what LeoLabs operates - curtain phased-array radars in various places, which detect and measure objects in orbit as they pass through the curtain’s field - see https://leolabs.space/radars/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://leolabs.space/radars/__;!!P7nkOOY!q8Arz3UDWiNlKOeNBmYNjSeER74Lye313jqr09DqZhKtMQsgspbU3q6isYZCywvVLpEh6xheI5cDl8v5n_nNa700Fw$>

They then offer conjuction analysis and warnings to satellite operators under contract, based on their catalog of objects and debris.

Best,

Mike
On Jul 7, 2023 at 14:51 +0200, tom@evslin.com, wrote:

Great visualization. Dumb question but I can’t figure it out. What are the orange planes labeled “instruments”? They are obviously related o the beams below them but I’m not sure what they are either.



Thank you



From: Starlink <starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> On Behalf Of Mike Puchol via Starlink
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 2:35 AM
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] orbital maneuvers 12 per sat in the last 6 months



Profession Hugh Lewis follows Starlink’s conjuction reports closely, and writes very detailed threads whenever a report comes up:

https://twitter.com/ProfHughLewis<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://twitter.com/ProfHughLewis__;!!P7nkOOY!q8Arz3UDWiNlKOeNBmYNjSeER74Lye313jqr09DqZhKtMQsgspbU3q6isYZCywvVLpEh6xheI5cDl8v5n_lMUPtd4A$>

Latest thread:

https://twitter.com/ProfHughLewis/status/1658173801924812803<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://twitter.com/ProfHughLewis/status/1658173801924812803__;!!P7nkOOY!q8Arz3UDWiNlKOeNBmYNjSeER74Lye313jqr09DqZhKtMQsgspbU3q6isYZCywvVLpEh6xheI5cDl8v5n_m75GwSNw$>

If you want an idea of -what- they are avoiding, LeoLabs operates a set of radars which track anything larger than 10cm in cross-section, and provides an awesome visualization here:

https://platform.leolabs.space/visualization<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://platform.leolabs.space/visualization__;!!P7nkOOY!q8Arz3UDWiNlKOeNBmYNjSeER74Lye313jqr09DqZhKtMQsgspbU3q6isYZCywvVLpEh6xheI5cDl8v5n_loP4_7LQ$>

(make sure to enable the “debris” checkbox too)



Best,

Mike

On Jul 7, 2023 at 08:23 +0200, Daniel AJ Sokolov via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>>, wrote:


On 7/6/23 22:28, blakangel@gmail.com<mailto:blakangel@gmail.com> wrote:


I think the main point of the article is that the amount of maneuvers
needed is currently increasing exponentially:

Indeed, I read that. But the article does not explain why they think
this trend will continue exponentially.

Obviously it can't continue exponentially forever, because eventually
all satellites are on the move evading one another 100% of the time. :-)

Cheers
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink__;!!P7nkOOY!q8Arz3UDWiNlKOeNBmYNjSeER74Lye313jqr09DqZhKtMQsgspbU3q6isYZCywvVLpEh6xheI5cDl8v5n_n7Ox06Rg$>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6853 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2023-07-08 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-07  0:54 Dave Taht
2023-07-07  1:01 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2023-07-07  4:49   ` David Lang
2023-07-07  5:28     ` blakangel
2023-07-07  6:02       ` David Lang
2023-07-07 22:28         ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-07-08 14:06           ` Dave Taht
2023-07-08 20:49             ` David Lang
2023-07-07  6:23       ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2023-07-07  6:34         ` Mike Puchol
2023-07-07  7:13           ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2023-07-07  7:22             ` Mike Puchol
2023-07-07 12:51           ` tom
2023-07-07 13:18             ` Mike Puchol
2023-07-08 13:53               ` Larry Press [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR03MB3863736130669024CFE6B9CDC232A@BYAPR03MB3863.namprd03.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=lpress@csudh.edu \
    --cc=mike@starlink.sx \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox