From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
Cc: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>,
Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] It's still the starlink latency...
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:14:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw48ZYaqZtdDRMYHkFSc-+GNPoTFRT2kYgJd2r646hsfAA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK2MWOuXV0faWKbdjS=pG7m7z0xkHVGCcLpdOaoD14SZrRfM_g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:02 PM Bruce Perens via Starlink
<starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 1:54 PM Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org> wrote:
>>
>> Every node in the path has to implement this to be effective.
>
>
> It would certainly be optimal if every node implemented it. But any node can detect the endpoint round-trip time, and how it degrades, and thus adjust how fast it feeds packets into the network. And a midpoint can detect when a host is feeding packets too fast for downstream nodes, and send explicit congestion notification, and failing that, drop some packets from that source.
yes.
Been working on libreqos.io lately, which is targetted at small ISPs,
and uses our latest XDP and cake code. It's getting marvelous - the
ipv6 code landed today, and we think we're good for 20gbit on 16 cores
on < $2k hw with purely free software.
Preseem (also using fq_codel) has been delivering a nice shaping
middlebox into the wisp market for going on 6 years.
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
--
FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-26 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-21 18:35 Dave Taht
2022-09-22 11:41 ` Andrew Crane
2022-09-22 12:01 ` Mike Puchol
2022-09-22 13:46 ` warren ponder
2022-09-22 15:07 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-22 15:26 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-26 15:20 ` Livingood, Jason
2022-09-26 15:29 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-26 15:57 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-26 16:21 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-26 16:32 ` Bruce Perens
2022-09-26 19:59 ` Eugene Chang
2022-09-26 20:04 ` Bruce Perens
2022-09-26 20:14 ` Ben Greear
2022-09-26 20:24 ` Bruce Perens
2022-09-26 20:32 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-26 20:36 ` Bruce Perens
2022-09-26 20:47 ` Ben Greear
2022-09-26 20:19 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-26 20:28 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-26 20:32 ` Bruce Perens
2022-09-26 20:35 ` Bruce Perens
2022-09-26 20:48 ` David Lang
2022-09-26 20:54 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-26 21:01 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-26 21:10 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-26 21:20 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-26 21:35 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-26 21:44 ` David Lang
2022-09-26 21:44 ` Bruce Perens
2022-09-27 0:35 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-27 0:55 ` Bruce Perens
2022-09-27 1:12 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-27 4:06 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-27 3:50 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-27 7:09 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-27 22:46 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-28 9:54 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-28 18:49 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-26 21:22 ` David Lang
2022-09-26 21:29 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-27 3:47 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-27 6:36 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-27 13:55 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-28 0:20 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-26 21:02 ` Bruce Perens
2022-09-26 21:14 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2022-09-26 21:10 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-26 21:28 ` warren ponder
2022-09-26 21:34 ` Bruce Perens
2022-09-27 16:14 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-26 21:17 ` David Lang
2022-09-29 9:10 David Fernández
2022-09-29 19:34 ` Eugene Chang
2022-10-17 13:50 David Fernández
2022-10-17 16:53 ` David Fernández
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw48ZYaqZtdDRMYHkFSc-+GNPoTFRT2kYgJd2r646hsfAA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=bruce@perens.com \
--cc=eugene.chang@ieee.org \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox