* [Starlink] paper: a first look at starlink performance
@ 2022-10-25 16:23 Dave Taht
2022-10-26 8:21 ` Nitinder Mohan
2022-10-28 9:21 ` Olivier Bonaventure
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2022-10-25 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht via Starlink
Cc: Olivier Bonaventure, martino.trevisan, francois.michel, danilo.giordano
So nice to see olivier's name pop up on this (yay!) open access publication:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3517745.3561416
I would have liked if they had tracked the starlink bandwidth
distributions over time as I did here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1puRjUVxJ6cCv-rgQ_zn-jWZU9ae0jZbFATLf4PQKblM/edit
and I wonder if the tools they used for their tests are available
somewhere(?), so they can be repeated over time, especially as more
ISL links go up.
--
This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Starlink] paper: a first look at starlink performance
2022-10-25 16:23 [Starlink] paper: a first look at starlink performance Dave Taht
@ 2022-10-26 8:21 ` Nitinder Mohan
2022-10-28 9:21 ` Olivier Bonaventure
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nitinder Mohan @ 2022-10-26 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht, Dave Taht via Starlink
Cc: francois.michel, Olivier Bonaventure, danilo.giordano, martino.trevisan
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1553 bytes --]
Another interesting paper in the same program: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3517745.3561457
Thanks and Regards
Nitinder Mohan
Technical University Munich (TUM)
https://www.nitindermohan.com/
From: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Reply: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: 25. October 2022 at 18:24:21
To: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: martino.trevisan@dia.units.it <martino.trevisan@dia.units.it>, Olivier Bonaventure <olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be>, danilo.giordano@polito.it <danilo.giordano@polito.it>, francois.michel@uclouvain.be <francois.michel@uclouvain.be>
Subject: [Starlink] paper: a first look at starlink performance
So nice to see olivier's name pop up on this (yay!) open access publication:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3517745.3561416
I would have liked if they had tracked the starlink bandwidth
distributions over time as I did here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1puRjUVxJ6cCv-rgQ_zn-jWZU9ae0jZbFATLf4PQKblM/edit
and I wonder if the tools they used for their tests are available
somewhere(?), so they can be repeated over time, especially as more
ISL links go up.
--
This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3219 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Starlink] paper: a first look at starlink performance
2022-10-25 16:23 [Starlink] paper: a first look at starlink performance Dave Taht
2022-10-26 8:21 ` Nitinder Mohan
@ 2022-10-28 9:21 ` Olivier Bonaventure
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Olivier Bonaventure @ 2022-10-28 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht, Dave Taht via Starlink
Cc: martino.trevisan, francois.michel, danilo.giordano
Dave,
> So nice to see olivier's name pop up on this (yay!) open access publication:
>
> https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3517745.3561416
>
> I would have liked if they had tracked the starlink bandwidth
> distributions over time as I did here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1puRjUVxJ6cCv-rgQ_zn-jWZU9ae0jZbFATLf4PQKblM/edit
>
> and I wonder if the tools they used for their tests are available
> somewhere(?), so they can be repeated over time, especially as more
> ISL links go up.
All the data is available, including pcaps for all experiments
https://smartdata.polito.it/a-first-look-at-starlink-performance-open-data/
François can give you more details about the QUIC implementations used
for the measurements if you'd like to reproduce them in your testbed.
The main benefit of QUIC compared to TCP is that it provides more data
about packet losses and allowed us to explore packet loss bursts
Olivier
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-28 9:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-25 16:23 [Starlink] paper: a first look at starlink performance Dave Taht
2022-10-26 8:21 ` Nitinder Mohan
2022-10-28 9:21 ` Olivier Bonaventure
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox