Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "David Fernández" <davidfdzp@gmail.com>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] apnic piece on starlink
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 09:17:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4Ck7gHSgs0KHE1CdSHa83YeCfqbMFCQeygZH9zNnBh8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC=tZ0pnk0+ESdd8gb3MTSOK12p_zxM9WCQNJJuYqyhvUvBZsg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 9:07 AM David Fernández via Starlink
<starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> 60+ only? Maybe it is this what you are remembering: 437 pages
> https://storage.googleapis.com/x-prod.appspot.com/files/The%20Loon%20Library.pdf

Yes! I wish every project reserved funding towards writing up failure
so eloquently. I had tried, in Nicaragua, in 206-2008
to get IPv6 deployed (tunneling ipv4 over it), and had meant to write
up that set of problems. I was planning to publish the "WISP6"
postmortem in the the 2010 timeframe but got sucked into just working
on bloat.

I had been going instinctively on that enormous list of problems
since, and mostly licked them (or so I thought), in cerowrt by 2014,
not realizing that the wisp market had evolved in an entirely
different direction.





> Do you remember Solar Impulse 2 travel around the world? It had to
> stop and land every five days or so. This is the evolution: Skydweller
> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-9865021/US-Navy-developing-pilotlesss-solar-powered-plane-fly-90-days-straight.html
>
> The total footprint of a satellite coverage consists of multiple spot
> beams with typical diameters ranging from 200-1000 km in GEO
> deployments, 100-500 km in LEO deployments and 4 – 200 Km for HAPS
> deployment.
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
> > Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 12:38:38 -0700
> > From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> > To: Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>,  Dave Taht via Starlink
> >       <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>, George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Starlink] apnic piece on starlink
> > Message-ID:
> >       <CAA93jw6se4qzxm+9tHb1BX+82qUkERqze7wk507w2A1GRdeDwQ@mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 12:07 PM Hesham ElBakoury via Starlink
> > <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Google Spinoff Aalyira salvaged Project Loon technology for US military.
> >>
> >> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/09/google-spinoff-aalyria-salvages-project-loon-technology-for-the-us-military/amp
> >>
> >> Hesham
> >
> > I did not know that. Loon did one of the greatest post-mortems of any
> > project I had ever read, 60+ pages long, and I cannot find it now.
> >
> >
> > (I love having you all on this list!)
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 8, 2023, 11:37 AM Michael Richardson via Starlink
> >> <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> David Lang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >>>     > Google shuttered project Loon (balloons to do this rather than
> >>> UAVs) in
> >>>     > the last year or two
> >>>
> >>> I heard that too, but also that some external entity then put up some
> >>> money
> >>> and partnered to start it up again.
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink



-- 
AMA March 31: https://www.broadband.io/c/broadband-grant-events/dave-taht
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-10 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-10 16:07 David Fernández
2023-04-10 16:17 ` Dave Taht [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-04-05 20:09 Dave Taht
2023-04-07  9:55 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-04-07 12:10   ` David Lang
2023-04-08 11:48     ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-04-08 17:37       ` David Lang
2023-04-08 18:37         ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-08 18:58           ` Hesham ElBakoury
2023-04-08 19:07           ` Hesham ElBakoury
2023-04-08 19:38             ` Dave Taht
2023-04-08 19:56               ` Hesham ElBakoury
2023-04-08 22:37             ` Larry Press

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw4Ck7gHSgs0KHE1CdSHa83YeCfqbMFCQeygZH9zNnBh8A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=davidfdzp@gmail.com \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox