On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 3:58 AM Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink < starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > > Le 17/08/2023 à 18:42, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit : > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 7:47 AM Dave Taht wrote: > >> This paper, at first glance, looks really, really good, measuring > >> detailed topology of the starlink network: > >> https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06863 > >> > >> Thank you J Pan for passing it along! > > More recent data here: > > > https://www.reddit.com/r/StarlinkEngineering/comments/15p76j4/impressive_improvement_in_three_months_no_longer/ > > Sorry but I do not understand the graphs. The URL sounds great. > > I have cc´d the author. > For my part, I can tell that I follow one particular sat chosen > arbitrarily (STARLINK-6064) on a public database since some weeks now > and it keeps at around 360km altitude. That is much lower than > 500-or-so usual. Maybe it is that lower altitude that permits a higher > performance (lower latencies). > Pretty neat! > > (there are other sats even lower, but not sure whether they're there in > error or on their way up). > this was really good: https://radionavlab.ae.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/starlink_structure.pdf Getting more correlated results from two or more stations in the same cell would help. > Alex > > > > >> > >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- > >> From: J Pan > >> Date: Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:02 PM > >> Subject: starlink > >> To: dave.taht@gmail.com > >> > >> > >> Hi Dave: thanks for your libreqos work. did you see > >> https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06863 ? cheers. -j > >> -- > >> J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA, > Web.UVic.CA/~pan > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxmoBr4cBKg > >> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > -- Oct 30: https://netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos