Le 17/08/2023 à 18:42, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 7:47 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This paper, at first glance, looks really, really good, measuring
>> detailed topology of the starlink network:
>> https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06863
>>
>> Thank you J Pan for passing it along!
> More recent data here:
> https://www.reddit.com/r/StarlinkEngineering/comments/15p76j4/impressive_improvement_in_three_months_no_longer/
Sorry but I do not understand the graphs. The URL sounds great.
I have cc´d the author.
For my part, I can tell that I follow one particular sat chosen
arbitrarily (STARLINK-6064) on a public database since some weeks now
and it keeps at around 360km altitude. That is much lower than
500-or-so usual. Maybe it is that lower altitude that permits a higher
performance (lower latencies).
Pretty neat!
(there are other sats even lower, but not sure whether they're there in
error or on their way up).
Getting more correlated results from two or more stations in the same cell would help.
Alex
>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: J Pan <Pan@uvic.ca>
>> Date: Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:02 PM
>> Subject: starlink
>> To: dave.taht@gmail.com <dave.taht@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> Hi Dave: thanks for your libreqos work. did you see
>> https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06863 ? cheers. -j
>> --
>> J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA, Web.UVic.CA/~pan
>>
>>
>> --
>> Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxmoBr4cBKg
>> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
>
>
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink