Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Cc: David Lang <david@lang.hm>, starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink and VPN
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:53:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4nGZWPT2y6hMA6jYgRD5J6fkmg0oAgd2JsDmQ+-+Sffw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AA55F2DF-1397-470D-ADCF-F6C68FD03C39@gmail.com>

How about openvpn over ipv6?

Or with a static ip assigned to the starlink?

Wireguard works for me....

On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 3:02 PM Dino Farinacci via Starlink
<starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> I haven't tried openvpn but I have done a bunch of testing of LISP over Starlink. If anyone wants details I can point you to an Internet Draft and slides that have been presented a couple of times at IETF.
>
> Dino
>
> > On Jan 20, 2025, at 11:25 PM, David Lang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >
> > has anyone done any work with openvpn over starlink (especially if they got the connectors to completely bypass the router)?
> >
> > I've got the basic connectivity working, but am having problems trying to get openvpn to work (especially for traffic back through the cgnat to the router on the starlink side)
> >
> > the logs on the client are reporting link local: (not bound) when trying UDP, when I try TCP (and clamp the mtu low) I can connect from the starlink side (st least sometimes) but cannot get the routing the other way to work
> >
> > David Lang
> > _______________________________________________
> > Starlink mailing list
> > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink



-- 
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-22 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-21  7:25 David Lang
2025-01-21 11:43 ` David Collier-Brown
2025-01-21 15:12 ` b. angel
2025-01-21 15:22   ` David Lang
2025-01-21 15:27     ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-01-21 15:36       ` Nils Andreas Svee
2025-01-21 15:45       ` David Lang
2025-01-21 16:14     ` Keith Simonsen
2025-01-21 16:45       ` David Lang
2025-01-21 15:36 ` Gert Doering
2025-01-21 15:52   ` David Lang
2025-01-21 23:02 ` Dino Farinacci
2025-01-22 22:53   ` Dave Taht [this message]
2025-01-22 23:25     ` Dino Farinacci
2025-01-22 23:29       ` Darrell Budic
2025-01-22 23:42         ` Dino Farinacci
2025-01-23  3:10     ` David Lang
2025-01-23 17:31       ` J Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw4nGZWPT2y6hMA6jYgRD5J6fkmg0oAgd2JsDmQ+-+Sffw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=farinacci@gmail.com \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox