From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa1-x2a.google.com (mail-oa1-x2a.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FB4F3B29E for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 17:54:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-oa1-x2a.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-29fae583cc8so173483fac.1 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:54:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1737586450; x=1738191250; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=BgoejPLKK09N2IPc/B9gJ9uXFSeNag7TnwbPinexhqA=; b=bxHSwDDf/b7PtkZ2xXUDwFXLdqd4+JImVtIX+KwtmfxuGZKy4dpEQsn/FqwLKFFoTe EW/pYxmGuHilhxGPjLTNu+sfIjogxxNGEEL2im2obqF5ZY0LjC2uDuDQgQuiC8AeC92z a9dcghR9GQlTRIPu/ucIsZadxAWkxfD3RJN+DwrE3+kbrDuaBcynjFkg+FZo5csvHwHT J7+4yY2HtpIZEnqLGMAVdQ3y0mihSQ5yqTFIYK1VSaaEg/DWxyK3aeXxWGcSzTRImVpY bpzbR1eef+ZZ2bd6IipOnQKtpV3lQ1li57xl4FtyHDEDHI2SObVATWN2DQIfsejBu87e 49SA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737586450; x=1738191250; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BgoejPLKK09N2IPc/B9gJ9uXFSeNag7TnwbPinexhqA=; b=dpMCpPy5s2Rm5SfjNx1IojluWLfEBq7BIYdHnpCLxNFk++2aCM2akFIRiktusDhYJx kn6thPYjSUvmw6s+rdOOS5K72+s/7q2+WadQrNnFx5O1UK+BA1kUmnaHnRB2TIFz7nkl cAQ7dQPkQu6gyX4uq79j1a2nfw/WNFd+6jVwF6xUIN/uFoXinaLF/2pE8CzoL4r4UXu+ kY3rzLPblfv/KF7QSsKjSkm3O5/5b5PVZuz36coP48qRhyp95eWX20WrUtV0gpssfNV6 ut0T7Ts7XBQAdcx13RWAUpGzgnUQyFaFtqUIJdXqlJHd+aldPfukEcFlyqMXzjK43luR kWjg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUPrZv+wgqoFl7IbcRVXT3FGOD4Rhv6G1xjYV/EnR7iI6HSm53sjH5lysXzawfP7gVHxoPXN8KTRw==@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx1Ue+a2NnsUohxjg5hZkhqKoE6faGCYxGp6OhJzadYGCYrLUkq DcmbURLp5hynzBoCzSmYPGMYtcPUipWUW1DjWCkMRkdN8i0ywU6hZZjtxGqmapFgBgMa0KHhn5O oNPZkOkxGrqTU3u9rrycHrrdIn5tuPQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvROLO8JhH+WFbI+Ik421Ryt+orpQdhwx1PhD2kuJb5gaU8HxiQmg5iBpsMK2P ZPHJbH9IkDMxUPpu7JXGH9vsQvz+yOMCzzE+cQq8HP2k9Noo1ut1L84saRlSlvGZhxwFIX67oOw 29b/CDwbgG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE7fmMiShKeEX2YJmImTVmGDDgILq3JJiKKLWgbJ0sumAxdxzpxNHrnp10bZccko7R8SrU3b80uu7/2JOtO76U= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:a6a1:b0:29e:6dea:223a with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2b27201f42bmr782832fac.14.1737586449751; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:54:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <269839o2-003o-1756-8r28-3on7q7nsrn54@ynat.uz> In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:53:57 -0800 X-Gm-Features: AWEUYZkz9sDW_ngnKWLwSUyPJ5SUQmhcNWWYKtWM5pf9wxXdaJz1jteC4cv6Ucg Message-ID: To: Dino Farinacci Cc: David Lang , starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink and VPN X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 22:54:10 -0000 How about openvpn over ipv6? Or with a static ip assigned to the starlink? Wireguard works for me.... On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 3:02=E2=80=AFPM Dino Farinacci via Starlink wrote: > > I haven't tried openvpn but I have done a bunch of testing of LISP over S= tarlink. If anyone wants details I can point you to an Internet Draft and s= lides that have been presented a couple of times at IETF. > > Dino > > > On Jan 20, 2025, at 11:25=E2=80=AFPM, David Lang via Starlink wrote: > > > > has anyone done any work with openvpn over starlink (especially if they= got the connectors to completely bypass the router)? > > > > I've got the basic connectivity working, but am having problems trying = to get openvpn to work (especially for traffic back through the cgnat to th= e router on the starlink side) > > > > the logs on the client are reporting link local: (not bound) when tryin= g UDP, when I try TCP (and clamp the mtu low) I can connect from the starli= nk side (st least sometimes) but cannot get the routing the other way to wo= rk > > > > David Lang > > _______________________________________________ > > Starlink mailing list > > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CSO, LibreQos