From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70BF13B29E;
 Sun, 17 Jul 2022 00:23:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id v16so12346955wrd.13;
 Sat, 16 Jul 2022 21:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=zQFWkM7m7p3Y6epDOEV4Gx4mTENI1BZ74digFNkVfZs=;
 b=dbodMRGsfwyhGfMAyAYtKPwnwdGTGpDqjhnXzCx86uaIzcNYD6iaWWGZYEr1+v39yC
 kJGcTO7coSgeXzu/76kXCeUPOxLUK4QhxF5Ezm+m0zwRj0ApHzARHWPZOP/PkFdrZPUN
 WWjUsDjLuUhiMYJje9qHf+IlMch/qClL2ZT99C4awJcNw+eY0SzkqCLWg1O13mGVHoH/
 s1PHLYF4OHVkSaja/ztVVUrQ23sdiJbPgH9tAVQwA+DWGlZiuEYBAFyJPTObri6ZDDL9
 tUlRnwnWWq6oJlAgkcOTl6QWxnTR5Z8z0sjkyLWkqZ6s8ESAybL/fLmZEKS9IyDIlHVw
 yfNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=zQFWkM7m7p3Y6epDOEV4Gx4mTENI1BZ74digFNkVfZs=;
 b=B0Yz26cAWvyobnIvJVAXwIF5fLKI7eaN5Buw4wOHEUOB0V36bs5z+fSAfV8xi52jcM
 2OqQGBdn7YCcGfhaMmQqiv36qzcNriS0TPfMMUeaNinbeidk9C/NotzgR433/7WZaHoz
 PoPzAf2eROOHGbdQfjCPUpKUDDIOF2h1W/6ltkJOd3HMnJW9FGGnYgUmYzVd8+fYBYnG
 Q+KuReTv4OkMGD11lSEBCRyk48yrYu1fdbIjgYX3Ogg8jNnmnsCSbvZv4aU/b6twPJbh
 Y7inZRSIMBW746gYFhdUpqvRriQhAA/oSQshssmJTbia5+MclpgY1C20w/cci7Oa56H6
 Drcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9MAKGiJOy9G+sxXn1fTWw+P/XO6xvvIfyljcrZetdlK2rum7Ch
 /FcfOQ/w2SzN1drTwgzJQL9SFloDH4lWJyNplHB/083gUHY36A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vAVc8/nhwYKNpxwAgdJOuwnJYbVsOcAT5+1vEkxiMwiXS0SZ556m9JRfSho0M+1/lBvcmqzCBVWexway4+7NM=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4f0b:0:b0:21d:705c:caf with SMTP id
 c11-20020a5d4f0b000000b0021d705c0cafmr18645257wru.55.1658031799986; Sat, 16
 Jul 2022 21:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 21:23:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4xOnrFu0qBRWq9Sfq8OqsQVgmxrCNsi+SM1qiH_OEt=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net, Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Starlink] It's still the latency, starlink!
X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." <starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/private/starlink/>
List-Post: <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 04:23:21 -0000

there's three "lovely" new speedtest results here, showing nearly 5sec
of uplink latency under load.

If only more folk would realize it's not the bandwidth, but the working lat=
ency.

https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlinks-massive-growth-results-in-congestion-s=
low-speeds-for-some-users

--=20
FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_code=
l/
Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC