From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
Cc: "starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Starlink] recent starlink rrul test result
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 09:36:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw4yeAATtAiip7wQxCUryuBA4TL1U2NkCEBzWjB=htrepA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC1714AA-CB8B-432D-94C1-93C94AFFF612@cable.comcast.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1559 bytes --]
wildly variable bandwidth, adjusted at 15 sec intervals, induced
latencies of 400ms, really terrible upload throughput relative to
down.
H/T David Lang for this data.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 9:31 AM Livingood, Jason
<Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote:
>
> When folks experience sub-par video conferencing over Starlink, it'd be great to see working latency stats at that time - such as via the easy test at https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat.
>
> On 2/23/22, 09:38, "Starlink on behalf of Dave Taht" <starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net on behalf of dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://blog.tomevslin.com/2022/02/starlinks-zoomready-rating-is-going-down.html__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!TjZjoTCGYO2gkt9xYrGdFrivrejHIdNjVe0TtEsCuQfDJTyNNy4u3_5CxlN2sj8WTA26WA$
>
> --
> I tried to build a better future, a few times:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.icei.org__;JSUl!!CQl3mcHX2A!TjZjoTCGYO2gkt9xYrGdFrivrejHIdNjVe0TtEsCuQfDJTyNNy4u3_5CxlN2sj-yqmwsLA$
>
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!TjZjoTCGYO2gkt9xYrGdFrivrejHIdNjVe0TtEsCuQfDJTyNNy4u3_5CxlN2sj_SP7yVhg$
>
--
I tried to build a better future, a few times:
https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
[-- Attachment #2: starlink-latency.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 199131 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-03 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-23 14:37 [Starlink] zoomready result Dave Taht
2022-03-03 14:31 ` Livingood, Jason
2022-03-03 14:36 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2022-03-03 14:45 ` [Starlink] recent starlink rrul test result tom
2022-03-03 15:03 ` Dave Taht
2022-03-03 15:15 ` David Lang
2022-03-03 17:16 ` Nathan Owens
2022-03-03 17:42 ` tom
2022-03-03 20:36 ` David Lang
2022-03-03 20:37 ` David Lang
2022-03-09 14:23 ` [Starlink] zoomready result Nathan Owens
2022-03-09 14:57 ` Dave Taht
2022-03-09 15:17 ` Nathan Owens
2022-03-11 17:05 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2022-03-11 22:48 ` Nathan Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA93jw4yeAATtAiip7wQxCUryuBA4TL1U2NkCEBzWjB=htrepA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=Jason_Livingood@comcast.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox