Re: [Starlink] Good APNIC blog on Starlink, testing Cubic, Reno, and BBR

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

Nice work Geoff!

What is it that people so love and trust about iperf3? (this is a
serious question, as I did not trust a multiplicity of iperfs methods
10 years ago, and while I know it has evolved, have not tested with it
recently vs a vs flent & netperf)

I was primarily looking at starlink upload speeds and delays with this document:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1puRjUVxJ6cCv-rgQ_zn-jWZU9ae0jZbFATLf4PQKblM/edit

But I haven't refreshed it. The nice thing about testing uplink
performance is you can more easily sample and control various tcp
parameters like pacing_rate, etc, as well as vary the underlying
qdisc.

There's a flent server available at sydney.starlink.taht.net if you'd
like to try it.

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 12:06 AM Bjørn Ivar Teigen <bjorn@domos.no> wrote:
>
> I think some of you might enjoy this: https://blog.apnic.net/2022/05/02/testing-leo-and-geo-satellite-services-in-australia/

Really good, solid work. I think he may have run into TSQ to some extent.


>
> No working latency tests, but a great intro to the tech and interesting TCP test results.
>
> Cheers,
> Bjørn Ivar Teigen
> --
> Bjørn Ivar Teigen
> Head of Research
> +47 47335952 | bjorn@domos.no | www.domos.no
> WiFi Slicing by Domos
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink



-- 
FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC