From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E44B3B29E for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 14:28:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id i128-20020a1c3b86000000b003a2ce31b4f8so1614778wma.1 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:28:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ot4f70xgXFo76YvwinYWkOfrlmOGUYnIc1we4YJ2Yuw=; b=MoyimUnTsOy/CFwmKveuI8cVz4uE71nIJAUbtJGzBzh8n9pTsPFEW5hqPVTYzIhdi8 RiByBvdxcvddLG8dxBSfERTIauLanrNpsvwxjxOBbxuTRt7HVtC7pTkeVq+re8OTFTZB 2NSaOuCKGot3IxfIberq9dfLl9lhuWRGMZ+Ov8+WN4vD0DzPaeZ1D8uL1A+FKQubjZ1c t4jSuL0G6T57m7KcxymSH+AbpdtZpj2Z4LkMzBi87GKagUMgHNHAeSz148upN5YyDcBM j/zW7hrOKGP7x4r5cjCCQ+czqbqLV+9igIDWo5w+yIv1GbYSb+jrR7DwYK4Q4H+gJtVz Ik3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ot4f70xgXFo76YvwinYWkOfrlmOGUYnIc1we4YJ2Yuw=; b=wiG3o+QD+lopIW6l1Ipfgz+QXNpjU7CohAvGevVh7BqMKKuUEBeCpplrDCgjLTh6h0 aJzINWMDxuntyoSR/1Gw4y5+gvkra0N9YSBvw+X1A3tDiBFZYssA6xy5ZmXLXhaHY7UI HQGYX2CKm84Nj/NkxXfzYXy9w64+7SLxii62AkBxbs32rgjPX6JNqXNwPStsnoPtLqR6 bcUc9hxM7JZ2maDVUftI/txzlgINL71BHYMhEN+GQVLFbOrn7aMg1BqoJvemlCLKgkNh oInuMZacqh3b4xeeV8B67tXYrUaM2IU6stDEruBfia5DyuBzMvLDQ86M39rfVnGEcCSz y7Pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9CZiT7++fSbgrZCZOiSzxaw45/XOPp+YCSTJPSkUPA8RdX+seP rk4xZ0ra7zqQlf9xNYpNuSJezIa07ROmpiiy3PKOcEDENq4naQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vlFLrkDU+Q/URZ4vlMSKj9iHWo1b8IHxFHZebXiQSq3Wa001Ao0gkhOykWgRq1iWsnRNhR5Y1JMVCQMkT/MQI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:48a:b0:3a2:ce31:a150 with SMTP id d10-20020a05600c048a00b003a2ce31a150mr5180624wme.48.1657218492226; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:28:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dave Taht Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:27:59 -0700 Message-ID: To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Starlink] some more starlink fun latency vs load plots X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 18:28:14 -0000 https://forum.openwrt.org/t/cake-w-adaptive-bandwidth/108848/3257 My favorites though are further up that link where we plot a highres isochronous signal against other traffic. I'm just dying to see lte (esp with movement), plotted this way also. In starlink's defense this is still so massively better than lte and most wifi, but I am compelled to perpetually point out it could be the best in the world, as elsewhere we are finally making some good progress on resolving 5 interrelated regressions in openwrt's fq-codel'd and ATF wifi codebase. https://forum.openwrt.org/t/aql-and-the-ath10k-is-lovely/59002/621 --=20 FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_code= l/ Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC