From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "Bjørn Ivar Teigen" <bjorn@domos.no>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Network quality for rocket scientists
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 07:30:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5UwWoUSoFwk00KNJDxSuxoZsxLZwvChJF54yzWoW7zYg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKf5G6K+i8akH-BmDqzXrB47jKUu3_oYdpX_h20mzb2sOdw8Ng@mail.gmail.com>
It is wonderful to see another take on this subject from another perspective!
Only nit is at the conclusion... the benefits of applying fair queuing
to level out apparent jitter is well demonstrated at this point, for
most kinds of traffic. Wish you'd mentioned it.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 7:07 AM Bjørn Ivar Teigen <bjorn@domos.no> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was inspired by the latest Starship presentation to write a piece on network quality in the language of rocket science. The blog can be found here: https://www.domos.no/news-updates/network-quality-for-rocket-scientists
>
> Cheers,
> Bjørn Ivar Teigen
>
> --
> Bjørn Ivar Teigen
> Head of Research
> +47 47335952 | bjorn@domos.no | www.domos.no
> WiFi Slicing by Domos
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
--
I tried to build a better future, a few times:
https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-14 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-14 15:07 Bjørn Ivar Teigen
2022-02-14 15:30 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2022-02-14 15:47 ` Bjørn Ivar Teigen
2022-02-14 16:06 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-02-14 16:32 ` Bjørn Ivar Teigen
2022-02-14 17:15 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-02-14 17:52 ` Bjørn Ivar Teigen
2022-02-14 18:38 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-02-14 19:21 ` Bjørn Ivar Teigen
2022-02-24 14:23 ` [Starlink] FQ " Dave Taht
2022-02-24 14:44 ` Michael Richardson
2022-02-14 18:08 ` [Starlink] Network quality " Dave Collier-Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw5UwWoUSoFwk00KNJDxSuxoZsxLZwvChJF54yzWoW7zYg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn@domos.no \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox