From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D4C03B2A4 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:30:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id jg20so13291438ejc.3 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 07:30:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u6MPKgIplBX6xJsBWhMy/IWY0J5XFwKsH1TkWJOFZxM=; b=dpG63O7CeuVqmBg/HRU/96lPxeWCtF4v9cqeMEpfWh+mKrdelMMZOZfLO8PYh5hcW4 am9b5QDYB/TCP4II6W/EooBwpaCPzVv2q0fsqUqd0p3eu5cVPYxLQxjqJ0Xp8m2goMVB yZl8vxGLA6aPrvaTgQvrt5JjqaLZ8/NXBtUagAha3MkL3dIY8KD0r5pVc5UjrxH07CAm 0NiraIRmTgBUG0KDSnW0Q6+SyXYOSp6vPrw2AlxB7tY6KuyH+6dRQODMPzHECekaYi0B IItwCweg0uHZIPpT7vR+8ZXxWY4Ro4kXb4rR4IclP9CJNKFGNVTNzVSXOa5ARyZaZJZ/ kmrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u6MPKgIplBX6xJsBWhMy/IWY0J5XFwKsH1TkWJOFZxM=; b=CfCXqJbnrL8N0oPX5MdKGjbWJ07Pk9AFeaUKbB7G7pb5QnMGwCR7h+vs/yzYfe87HD 5FKKq1iyav5puqeAGaW86qkKVBqAthJ8+VUEsNuiWMbzgTGhqRR9PBn1vn0Z6nykVAWG VzVQD6wQo4eimJ9DytFNlQUkeZnqVd7GKJxYMcYQIBd/xwgHGnPlmR7M/4McW6eWsUeb 1W05ssnrDNfLPoO9jdvjZaXM8MJ6b1WeNC2wKjWT4XJ1YJQ9F7lDw4Axy0cS3XPsPZtO xOzajCLm73BJEOSEq/W88/BE2pJlanxMrGiQg3wSSdhsg1TWtIHRSdawmGl+Oqkapv3z pRoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530DPndhiHkixUMF89mgSJcPweCx57EBkM7IKXfVJza1MxQI7cCy 8Yd5imsuxLtgIgYvcvTjGRwAofQcM/UEq4eVJ4KFQmxZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYhBAVanAcLULyIZZL/UyOyagFFqFMIV3LnUhIObndIvADgY9tx445EMvKpUoNWFmgCyW9SDWIK4BwAr/ej1o= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:73d0:: with SMTP id n16mr97351ejl.666.1644852637144; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 07:30:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 07:30:25 -0800 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Ivar_Teigen?= Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Starlink] Network quality for rocket scientists X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:30:38 -0000 It is wonderful to see another take on this subject from another perspectiv= e! Only nit is at the conclusion... the benefits of applying fair queuing to level out apparent jitter is well demonstrated at this point, for most kinds of traffic. Wish you'd mentioned it. On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 7:07 AM Bj=C3=B8rn Ivar Teigen wro= te: > > Hi everyone, > > I was inspired by the latest Starship presentation to write a piece on ne= twork quality in the language of rocket science. The blog can be found here= : https://www.domos.no/news-updates/network-quality-for-rocket-scientists > > Cheers, > Bj=C3=B8rn Ivar Teigen > > -- > Bj=C3=B8rn Ivar Teigen > Head of Research > +47 47335952 | bjorn@domos.no | www.domos.no > WiFi Slicing by Domos > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink --=20 I tried to build a better future, a few times: https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC