From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A9903B2A4 for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 14:28:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id g6so16007625ejw.1 for ; Fri, 06 May 2022 11:28:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Ho7IWNwsheSNZ4b1MsSp/vw6+ZuWqz+SJ0BgqR4c+k=; b=hqTeiLCmCzw/tdSLlhD/cyvubG4SnusP0OKpcxv3hObJbwiff3uXCQJdBTiBM0IYLw YFPoMzTVPZ5KkQdPfeaS/mFJBee0gcgxGiJ8SCwOMqTW5dIZUkqrbgCzMAq1ic1rxVJF W/S9JmtIxHBkQqqaHaS0r4/qyseq7HEZiP7aoGYcD+7ZfL4PahQGYsxaJlB37s0K09WC HaFoZlTXcsUw6cdoj7QCvlLyWS591BjVQYMxMMIqvhTyCDzRHJ8/aLemuqqAXYxDueR8 jlsybJNIfhwdXqY0nOZ1So6BwgGEjYEZPUBB5JVUFZ/6uYeMUGzM9iZJrOj5yTZmt5Qy +xmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Ho7IWNwsheSNZ4b1MsSp/vw6+ZuWqz+SJ0BgqR4c+k=; b=fvgbPKF/T2ksnGCpXO1G/Te7FU7atLzclKe9H1+N2s8gZDu+bALosCdjnJsAmuCDWT xLeqpKwLQw8ir4DHi2wURT+ms9tfLxrwNFAdj0Nwg8H5WwiYzQKXd9lm2qGd8h9DaU5V l6WZ9eG5k6TWUc46kK+/+Md48wsqNlNCRV4IcG9zd8KwmgAIxv9nY8tw+olFwb3gbhdj UWc29r11VUWZIprAv4PUR+X0r9c6UqqWlxAE6+wyNAIoj62Mar3cOGeegUDG+7scBjYf iNR4OMDuUQQwctcUzn6lZ33lTpYRK1sX9HnuGdFr3smButxnm3GtBq6CQSBSHDyiZzzQ RRtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530XRD0lOAYAaasIcVPBhMj/e9Oa9mqhDkNfaD1/9Z5aLzhqaJMn rpUSQdvgz1mrrW+OM6kn/j7X/mgh73ijvdkIXlg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwsXBnRWzC68/RxqARbB2bVlDVoOhZzYfjvMOfrlj1UdANFw2dvuOseLHcopCEM7GalaBp11PbxAhEhRQ3+fUc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4787:b0:6f4:2f25:f9ff with SMTP id cw7-20020a170906478700b006f42f25f9ffmr4289482ejc.116.1651861733530; Fri, 06 May 2022 11:28:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 11:28:40 -0700 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Ivar_Teigen?= Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net, Geoff Huston Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Starlink] Good APNIC blog on Starlink, testing Cubic, Reno, and BBR X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 18:28:54 -0000 It looks to me as though someone (microsoft? oneweb? starlink? someone else?) is finally paying attention to bufferbloat in washington state. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6928212720739635200/ --=20 FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_code= l/ Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC