Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Starlink] starlink upload behavior
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:22:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5YrcpR5YOYz+v+iTv9Ct893iak8psPJ+OFDzsd1yzH=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4MyyR3SGaUHg7HVaVn97CQJjQPByoiR8EvdaWe5mafjQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 806 bytes --]

I have just been leaving cake at 6Mbit on the upload and that fq and
control make it much
more tolerable for my mix of videoconferencing and uploads. That said,
I hadn't looked
at the native performance in a while which is markedly better than it
was a few months ago, at least for this quick test run.

If anyone can make sense of these... for the first 1/3 of the trace
throughput is low and RTTs are *NICE*,
the second looks like a sat switch - still nice... then another sat
switch where I get full upload throughput
and the latency grows significantly.

If anyone is into packet captures:

http://www.taht.net/~d/starlink-1-auto.cap # starlink through their wifi
http://www.taht.net/~d/starlink-1-cake6.cap # starlink through their
wifi, with cake bandwidth 6mbit on mine

Graphs produced with xplot.

[-- Attachment #2: starlink-up-acks.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 9898 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: starlink-up-rtt.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 9919 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: starlink-up-tput.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 8332 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #5: starlink-zoomed.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 19365 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #6: starlink-cake6-rtt.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 9320 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-31 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.3.1661875202.32670.starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2022-08-30 16:53 ` [Starlink] Starlink "beam spread" David P. Reed
2022-08-30 17:32   ` Doc Searls
2022-08-30 20:09     ` Mike Puchol
2022-08-30 20:35       ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2022-08-30 20:40         ` Mike Puchol
2022-08-30 21:09       ` David Lang
2022-08-30 21:01   ` David Lang
2022-08-30 22:07     ` Brandon Butterworth
2022-08-30 22:21       ` David Lang
2022-08-30 22:37         ` Brandon Butterworth
2022-08-30 23:07           ` David Lang
2022-08-30 23:45             ` Brandon Butterworth
2022-08-30 23:28           ` David P. Reed
2022-08-31  0:12             ` David Lang
2022-08-31  0:31               ` Dave Taht
2022-08-31  0:32               ` David P. Reed
2022-08-31 10:29                 ` Dave Collier-Brown
2022-08-31 18:51                   ` David Lang
2022-08-31 19:04             ` Dave Taht
2022-08-30 22:50       ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-08-30 23:13         ` David Lang
2022-08-31  0:46         ` tom
2022-08-31  0:58           ` Dave Taht
2022-08-31  7:36             ` Mike Puchol
2022-08-31  6:26         ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-08-31  7:25           ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-08-31  7:31             ` Hayden Simon
2022-08-31  7:33             ` David Lang
2022-08-31  9:59               ` Mike Puchol
2022-08-31 10:06                 ` David Lang
2022-08-31 10:12                   ` Mike Puchol
2022-08-31 17:52                 ` Dick Roy
2022-08-31 13:41               ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-08-31 14:30                 ` Mike Puchol
2022-08-31 21:44                   ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-09-01  7:58                 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-01 11:38                   ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-09-01 19:54                     ` Michael Richardson
2022-09-01 21:08                       ` tom
2022-09-02  7:52                         ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-02 12:29                           ` tom
2022-08-31  7:49             ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-08-31  9:25               ` Brandon Butterworth
2022-08-31  9:34                 ` David Lang
2022-09-01  9:12                   ` Brandon Butterworth
2022-08-31 14:52   ` Dave Taht
2022-08-31 15:22     ` Dave Taht [this message]
2022-09-01 19:24       ` [Starlink] starlink upload behavior Luis A. Cornejo
2022-09-01 19:50         ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw5YrcpR5YOYz+v+iTv9Ct893iak8psPJ+OFDzsd1yzH=g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox