has anyone been testing theirs this week?

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets
cloudflare'schristmas present
To: MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Jay Moran <jay@tp.org>, Cake List
<cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, Rpm
<rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
dickroy@alum.mit.edu <dickroy@alum.mit.edu>, libreqos
<libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>


Well Reddit has many posts talking about noticeable performance
increases for Starlink. Here is a primetime run:

waveform:
https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=333f97c7-7cbd-406c-8d9a-9f850cb5de7d

cloudflare attached



On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:43 AM MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com> wrote:
>
> Dave and Luis,
>
> Do you know if any of these tools are using ~random payloads, to defeat compression?
>
> UDPST has a CLI option:
> (m)    -X           Randomize datagram payload (else zeroes)
>
> When I used this option testing shipboard satellite access, download was about 115kbps.
>
> Al
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 11:12 AM
> > To: Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Jay Moran <jay@tp.org>; Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>; IETF IPPM
> > WG <ippm@ietf.org>; MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com>; Rpm
> > <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>; bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
> > dickroy@alum.mit.edu; libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets
> > cloudflare'schristmas present
> >
> > Either starlink has vastly improved, or the test is way off in this case.



-- 
This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC