From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFA483B29D for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:02:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id s14so21504564wro.0 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:02:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=MgCnDhr3jJSmLUZaSeCDM07kDnjZbxZPeP31lpk3aR0=; b=B340b99kzok9lVMgPs+0aqqIFwVHWlfcw2gvh1f+iW/lM3XR/lyjJVdtOCDK0oBkGZ UuDhUv4M2uB7icdN4Kozg0BBCN2HHiHl4Akly/kbk2ZIMeEZS8SR6wABiyiVaA9oVGM4 LO7xq8OHivtdigGmGU4UN8whi8JeHGm5HJbHSYR6Vwd71oY9Vfw4h+7343FDAaWi+f9q yr9a8tbjS0eVkO86O2D6KcOfXn1AZHWg3iOalvW/CAytu+XP0zoXrM7DfBpZKxpfbSHS KMLqVEoGRYBK5wizQSb7CQmoJykLcviwEe2fN8/oN82Y1/79ZSKczQqQPgVGLO0GGQOU zLIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=MgCnDhr3jJSmLUZaSeCDM07kDnjZbxZPeP31lpk3aR0=; b=gbFufXuhEyjHqDdJZzqbaRstHv+VFtT1jcKcOiMKHWyQvbN0YRoGSCpSOonMraw93S 0yarDP7oMjpVj5KGOLwMF04GUN9y1YJjtCrLYASYYkSeN/iVZVv+8+HZQTkdaoE1mUym YkUELlrWRDMOcKiDRh1qYnIK6hiOaGqEQSx39j6AhvVVIYuROlGstEfi9EVFnCOK1LYT xdycAPoAj7tV6BF9Zk03FMZtLZOz2EFQu3YBdRfm82EBiuQ7dB9PPNF87k6Xf12GDMtA zawR5NMbCOAbH9NYnuIQQk8ejKMOSFj22AngZv18UvnvykYIfyZnsJBJWXIY6YuZOibK Z1Wg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0891ocAPGAoxZcRcIlV4HTAGZMPiedWkkXqpLtCcPsafeJ5Z4R MVmdmPwQNyg0zniS29RDks6aBWEvbk23LHnhOGN8e8jf X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6Z7AJjDTT9bnpTmrbN8n36sx7FHOoFU6n8UxegDG+LXSAzdkI45ylOndjak0U7agdmSB22FzRigr3Foao6+kM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1565:b0:22c:8da7:3cf8 with SMTP id 5-20020a056000156500b0022c8da73cf8mr16414966wrz.688.1664395326382; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:02:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:01:54 -0700 Message-ID: To: Dotzero Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:02:07 -0000 Awesome. We don't have any data on their best effort service. It would be my hope they configure things with buffering suitable for that range of achievable speeds. On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:53 PM Dotzero via Starlink wrote: > > I've been on the wait list for almost 10 months and just received an emai= l that I can sign up for a "best efforts" offering. Seeing as they also ind= icated the estimated time for regular service is mid-2023, I decided to go = with it (You don't lose your place on the wait list). You can also "pause" = the best effort service so I don't really have anything to lose. > > Has anyone had experience with this offering? Any input appreciated. If i= t makes a difference, location is Central East Ohio. > > According to https://www.starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1002-69942-69?r= egionCode=3DUS, latency will be comparable to regular service, down will be= 5-100mbs and up will be 1-10mps unless service is deprioritized due to con= gestion. > > Thanks in advance. > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink --=20 FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_code= l/ Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC