Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] CFP march 1 - network measurement conference
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 11:54:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5hZt=DMU=LbOPQKj8sLRcDuqNfyqeZvwsE8P2O-qbZQw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4GAQh6R5CAmSjz0LR3GLKnQ+aew=tAqxEZ+h=oc3cm1Q@mail.gmail.com>

I am hoping people are all over this. I have a few thoughts towards a
paper from one of my projects, or perhaps I could just update and
summarize multiple rants from my blog,  and get in somehow?

Anyway, if anyone would like a insanely cruel pre-reviewer, an
impossible to satisfy test designer, and a wild experimentalist in on
*their* paper... and someone that is occasionally good with a ringing
phrase or two... please contact me privately. I am just terrible with
TeX.

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:00 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This CFP looks pretty good to me: https://tma.ifip.org/2024/call-for-papers/
>
> Because:
>
> ¨To further encourage the results’ faithfulness and avoid publication
> bias, the conference will particularly encourage negative results
> revealed by novel measurement methods or vantage points. All regular
> papers are hence encouraged to discuss the limitations of the
> presented approaches and also mention which experiments did not work.
> Additionally, TMA will also be open to accepting papers that
> exclusively deal with negative results, especially when new
> measurement methods or perspectives offer insight into the limitations
> and challenges of network measurement in practice. Negative results
> will be evaluated based on their impact (e.g. revealed in realistic
> production networks) as well as the novelty of the vantage points
> (e.g. scarce data source) or measurement techniques that revealed
> them."
>
>
> --
> :( My old R&D campus is up for sale: https://tinyurl.com/yurtlab
> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos



-- 
40 years of net history, a couple songs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-14 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-06 20:00 Dave Taht
2023-12-06 21:46 ` [Starlink] [NNagain] " Sauli Kiviranta
2023-12-07  2:22   ` Bill Woodcock
2023-12-07  2:49     ` Ricky Mok
2023-12-07 11:43       ` Nitinder Mohan
2023-12-07 20:05       ` Sauli Kiviranta
2023-12-08  6:03     ` rjmcmahon
2024-01-14 16:54 ` Dave Taht [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw5hZt=DMU=LbOPQKj8sLRcDuqNfyqeZvwsE8P2O-qbZQw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox