Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
Cc: Nathan Owens <nathan@nathan.io>,
	 Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] 9 starlink flights planned for june
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 18:12:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw67niiB4Y91zej18dXniXa35+Og0ikTP=PZ8N-yndExWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91393r13-o4r5-2n49-43q1-spr79r900q7q@ynat.uz>

On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 5:33 PM David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>
> As of mid-march, there were 6 launches scheduled for 'march', 4 of them
> starlink, at least 3 of them slipped.
>
> When they list 'June 30 2023' this may have been from an actual scheduled launch
> saying June 30, or it could be from a schedule entry of 'June' or one of 'Q2' or
> even 'H1'
>
> In March, some sites were listing SpaceX doing 3 launches from the same launch
> pad the same day as a result of this.
>
> But SpaceX has done 29 launches in the first 120 days, so they are a bit behind
> schedule for their aim to do 100 launches this year.
>
> rykllan (twitter and patreon) posts infographics showing the progress towards
> this goal every few weeks. Last year (when the target was 60 launches) she did
> it after every launch, but at the new pace, she's backed off a bit :-)
>
> It's also almost time for the next Bryce Briefing reporting on the worldwide
> launch stats for Q1 https://brycetech.com/briefing

Thx as always for ever more links to information. They recently
attempted launch from two pads on nearly the same day, I am wondering
what the turnaround time is for boosters these days, and how much
inventory they have. If they can improve their cycle time, 9/month
seems achievable on the 3 pads they have, aside from conflicts with
other launches.

Random thought - other launch sites long term? This was built to great
fanfare a while back

https://www.spaceportamerica.com/business/lease-build/

Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guiana_Space_Centre

And: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kwajalein_Atoll



>
> David Lang
>
>
> On Wed, 3 May 2023, Nathan Owens via Starlink wrote:
>
> > FWIW, many of those are likely to slip, there are a number of commercial
> > launches in June/July. Depends if they re-shuffle Group 6 ahead of other
> > shells.
> >
> > Upcoming non-starlink launches from the cape:
> >
> > May:
> > - Arabsat 7A (SLC-40)
> >
> > June:
> > - CRS-28 (LC-39A)
> > - WorldView Legion 1 & 2 (SLC-40)
> > - Axiom 2 (LC-39A), TBD
> > - Turksat 6A (39A or 40)
> > - Astranis (39A or 40)
> > - O3b MPower 5 & 6 (39A or 40)
> >
> > July:
> > - Galaxy 37 (39A or 40)
> > - USSF-52 (39A)
> > - Euclid (39A or 40)
> > - USSF-36 (39A or 40)
> > - Thuraya 4-NGS (39A or 40)
> >
> > August:
> > - Crew 7 (39A)
> > - Echostar 24 (39A)
> >
> > Sept:
> > - Axiom 3 (39A)
> > - Polaris Dawn (39A)
> > - Ovzon 3 (39A or 40)
> >
> > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:19 PM Dave Taht via Starlink <
> > starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Ḿind boggling.
> >>
> >> https://twitter.com/VirtuallyNathan/status/1653867999919751169
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Podcast:
> >> https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7058793910227111937/
> >> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Starlink mailing list
> >> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink



-- 
Podcast: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7058793910227111937/
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-04  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-03 21:18 Dave Taht
2023-05-03 21:30 ` Nathan Owens
2023-05-04  0:33   ` David Lang
2023-05-04  1:12     ` Dave Taht [this message]
2023-05-04  1:34       ` David Lang
2023-05-04 12:45         ` Dave Taht
2023-05-04 13:21           ` David Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw67niiB4Y91zej18dXniXa35+Og0ikTP=PZ8N-yndExWg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=nathan@nathan.io \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox