* [Starlink] successful drone attack on starlink terminal @ 2024-02-23 12:04 Dave Taht 2024-02-23 13:23 ` Alexandre Petrescu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Dave Taht @ 2024-02-23 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Taht via Starlink https://twitter.com/Megaconstellati/status/1760996758363029734 In general, two can play at this game, and given the low cost and good range, and relative ease of building a sensor for the starlink frequencies, I see starlinks fading from the battlefield. For that matter, nearly every form of electronic communication, be it wifi, or 5G. Fiber or laser will be used instead. See also the flipper zero. https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/02/canada-vows-to-ban-flipper-zero-device-in-crackdown-on-car-theft/ -- 40 years of net history, a couple songs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Starlink] successful drone attack on starlink terminal 2024-02-23 12:04 [Starlink] successful drone attack on starlink terminal Dave Taht @ 2024-02-23 13:23 ` Alexandre Petrescu 2024-02-23 13:36 ` Alexandre Petrescu 2024-02-23 18:13 ` Eugene Chang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Alexandre Petrescu @ 2024-02-23 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: starlink Le 23/02/2024 à 13:04, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit : > https://twitter.com/Megaconstellati/status/1760996758363029734 > > In general, two can play at this game, and given the low cost and good > range, and relative ease of building a sensor for the starlink > frequencies, I see starlinks fading from the battlefield. For that > matter, nearly every form of electronic communication, be it wifi, or > 5G. Fiber or laser will be used instead. But laser could be blinded by counter-lasers, fiber could be cut by scissors, etc. Measures, counter-measures, counter-counter-measures and so on, equally well on each of these media. Alex > > See also the flipper zero. > > https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/02/canada-vows-to-ban-flipper-zero-device-in-crackdown-on-car-theft/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Starlink] successful drone attack on starlink terminal 2024-02-23 13:23 ` Alexandre Petrescu @ 2024-02-23 13:36 ` Alexandre Petrescu 2024-02-23 18:13 ` Eugene Chang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Alexandre Petrescu @ 2024-02-23 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: starlink Le 23/02/2024 à 14:23, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : > > > Le 23/02/2024 à 13:04, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit : >> https://twitter.com/Megaconstellati/status/1760996758363029734 >> >> In general, two can play at this game, and given the low cost and >> good range, and relative ease of building a sensor for the >> starlink frequencies, I see starlinks fading from the battlefield. >> For that matter, nearly every form of electronic communication, be >> it wifi, or 5G. Fiber or laser will be used instead. > > But laser could be blinded by counter-lasers, fiber could be cut by > scissors, etc. > > Measures, counter-measures, counter-counter-measures and so on, > equally well on each of these media. A way forward could be to induce equilibrium rather than instability-increase albeit breakthrough technologies. More equilibrium might(?) come from suggesting that all starlink be made equally available to all parties (like Internet is), but that certainly sounds as a crazy proposal in the current context of sanctions, even if people do agree that Internet should stay up equally well for all. So, I dont know. It's just that it looks very dangerous what is happening there. Alex > > Alex > >> >> See also the flipper zero. >> >> https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/02/canada-vows-to-ban-flipper-zero-device-in-crackdown-on-car-theft/ > >> _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Starlink] successful drone attack on starlink terminal 2024-02-23 13:23 ` Alexandre Petrescu 2024-02-23 13:36 ` Alexandre Petrescu @ 2024-02-23 18:13 ` Eugene Chang 2024-02-23 18:31 ` Dave Collier-Brown 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Eugene Chang @ 2024-02-23 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexandre Petrescu; +Cc: Eugene Chang, starlink [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1274 bytes --] > On Feb 23, 2024, at 3:23 AM, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > > > > Le 23/02/2024 à 13:04, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit : >> https://twitter.com/Megaconstellati/status/1760996758363029734 >> In general, two can play at this game, and given the low cost and good >> range, and relative ease of building a sensor for the starlink >> frequencies, I see starlinks fading from the battlefield. For that >> matter, nearly every form of electronic communication, be it wifi, or >> 5G. Fiber or laser will be used instead. > > But laser could be blinded by counter-lasers, fiber could be cut by scissors, etc. > > Measures, counter-measures, counter-counter-measures and so on, equally well on each of these media. > > Alex The point is some media can be remotely detected and targeted. Laser is harder to detect than wireless (radio). Fiber is even harder to be detected remotely. Gene > >> See also the flipper zero. >> https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/02/canada-vows-to-ban-flipper-zero-device-in-crackdown-on-car-theft/ > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink [-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Starlink] successful drone attack on starlink terminal 2024-02-23 18:13 ` Eugene Chang @ 2024-02-23 18:31 ` Dave Collier-Brown 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Dave Collier-Brown @ 2024-02-23 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: starlink [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3076 bytes --] When I was in the reserves (in an era of dinosaurs and stone axes), the regulars were using encrypted, frequency-agile radios. They were hard to localize unless you were so close that they were the loudest thing on the airwaves. Using Starlink from a fixed location Could Be Bad. --dave On 2024-02-23 13:13, Eugene Chang via Starlink wrote: On Feb 23, 2024, at 3:23 AM, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net><mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: Le 23/02/2024 à 13:04, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit : https://twitter.com/Megaconstellati/status/1760996758363029734 In general, two can play at this game, and given the low cost and good range, and relative ease of building a sensor for the starlink frequencies, I see starlinks fading from the battlefield. For that matter, nearly every form of electronic communication, be it wifi, or 5G. Fiber or laser will be used instead. But laser could be blinded by counter-lasers, fiber could be cut by scissors, etc. Measures, counter-measures, counter-counter-measures and so on, equally well on each of these media. Alex The point is some media can be remotely detected and targeted. Laser is harder to detect than wireless (radio). Fiber is even harder to be detected remotely. Gene See also the flipper zero. https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/02/canada-vows-to-ban-flipper-zero-device-in-crackdown-on-car-theft/ _______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink _______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net<mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest dave.collier-brown@indexexchange.com<mailto:dave.collier-brown@indexexchange.com> | -- Mark Twain CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication, including any and all attachments, contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If you have received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from your inbox and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not constitute an express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by electronic means, nor does it constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment or an acceptance of a contract offer. Contract terms contained in this telecommunication are subject to legal review and the completion of formal documentation and are not binding until same is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized signatory. [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4809 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-23 18:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-02-23 12:04 [Starlink] successful drone attack on starlink terminal Dave Taht 2024-02-23 13:23 ` Alexandre Petrescu 2024-02-23 13:36 ` Alexandre Petrescu 2024-02-23 18:13 ` Eugene Chang 2024-02-23 18:31 ` Dave Collier-Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox