Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Starlink] more continuous starlink measurements?
@ 2024-08-26 21:56 Dave Taht
  2024-08-26 21:59 ` J Pan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2024-08-26 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Taht via Starlink

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 683 bytes --]

It´s been oh, 8 months? since the first batch of  academic results were
published about starlink´s behaviors. Anyone got new results since then?

I rarely test my own link anymore because it´s been so darned solid, but
recently I stayed in a hotel and visited a coffeeshop where the network
made me nuts, so I went home and got my first ever "A" on the waveform test:

https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=630f59f0-f0a8-4f14-a829-5a31770e8041

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7233950679348760576/

-- 
Artists/Musician Campout Aug 9-11
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/healing-arts-event-tickets-928910826287
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1284 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-26 22:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-08-26 21:56 [Starlink] more continuous starlink measurements? Dave Taht
2024-08-26 21:59 ` J Pan
2024-08-26 22:18   ` [Starlink] polaris dawn Dave Taht

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox