From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FC503B29E for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:29:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id n12so10775309wrx.9 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:29:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=03BmTHrKoG2xH3f6q6WZ8GOq9r0CkoXM17pC3axesII=; b=BA7fVvKGWE0FHHpehfa2Vl3EN0p5yNWz1Lu0upQ3oZ60FpFGhFs7a8Jhq+S6HkdCx+ o1ZBG6woql1rdcGdtfUCmAEsCSR7CrAttJeHzNkgP1S8Indexr72OINzDHol8S4hmkb/ +kjn/nHpRx9QkQTYnWwIpcR+Tm3/NqTyYwbmetI7wnZqQrFVSsy1saCLniJr+0TLyWw5 WMLv6mWi+F4tYNxPIi1aCeN6EkylYo27Wtnm0tclGWMWIEG8taoV2gZeVZnDK9K2zO8y Ir4D7ARdaYjZMqGebpTccpMarvkYLhj6FHGDSN2ITa3uTnjyXp6PRzQIcl413SSQWbQ6 HufA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=03BmTHrKoG2xH3f6q6WZ8GOq9r0CkoXM17pC3axesII=; b=4e5OrMAsgms9DyTGja/pxFZMwTvswisHsuJ6ZbumdDzgoujjKUrOEPq/RyOG4jlxVO cA+dgE30IaTsSQXuD5pKLnKJotNlcr8/5NjYWJdA4LQEvZi6jBsJJ2LMhT9U7XbY1fDf dZ8ZjyqD8mzHaFu+A9aMW342N+urTen9rUOqgZiI0fOZQkFjtRGV5CtDWl3a5DuviG4X 1jA30hpefTGEMrdYj+ge/LXQ+RAoRvclrdJ22zk3MVvqpP7qEO2MghF/jzJspyIdEe4B bRMUmfp8R95VNJsKELfvvnXuZJOcUcOiRZqyabWfBYGXAoheqmZWh0uLB9RhysNzRv9e 6ZCg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2Quxjf0+yAoCxQmUDaY+QfrItNIHrxmeFRstrFM4scqRY4Ead8 cxYsQwcYO01sZrTw89g++4v00meBlj57RXAdgN6WDoUq X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7Dr2o9jQXGKYg4flluoBEpGTpNspLUCR1jyQeBMKNP8Iur39OejNrFM0BVyfKeJDuIHI1GcjpP4melmwdCWH8= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d0b:0:b0:22a:ca5b:a37e with SMTP id e11-20020a5d6d0b000000b0022aca5ba37emr13734744wrq.383.1664206167979; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:29:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <060F7695-D48E-413C-9501-54ECC651ABEB@cable.comcast.com> In-Reply-To: <060F7695-D48E-413C-9501-54ECC651ABEB@cable.comcast.com> From: Dave Taht Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:29:15 -0700 Message-ID: To: "Livingood, Jason" Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Starlink] It's still the starlink latency... X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:29:29 -0000 On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 8:20 AM Livingood, Jason wrote: > > The awareness & understanding of latency & impact on QoE is nearly unknow= n among reporters. IMO maybe there should be some kind of background briefi= ngs for reporters - maybe like a simple YouTube video explainer that is sho= rt & high level & visual? Otherwise reporters will just continue to focus o= n what they know... That's a great idea. I have visions of crashing the washington correspondents dinner, but perhaps there is some set of gatherings journalists regularly attend? > > =EF=BB=BFOn 9/21/22, 14:35, "Starlink on behalf of Dave Taht via Starlink= " wrote: > > I still find it remarkable that reporters are still missing the > meaning of the huge latencies for starlink, under load. > > --=20 FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_code= l/ Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC