From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62A623B29E for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 20:20:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id p4so89378wms.0 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:20:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fc21/mvY8yb5HJWqViPHABdN9LP2Zig6pUZR6g53N/s=; b=OTsnQ0IXZWWGCp72zXnQLbBQ12JrSv78jXrS7BTZCLZw7F4db6nR8joaMqpcuYm3fX eWaDNn0WxtN0Ul0dS25CL/uup+WEFwRhX+9buf1aFMNOkt56y6NFTdyFuSIABrU4L6TW Bq4ulIVdbkpwjxPma+JzBDLIY0aJrhBCCu4+gWiEyWdERAqJdIgrhPtihEexzKzTuFXK nvzIhx4/crVwCTWXYLA2I7AdFRx8ETpq1XO48TQNCRpCCJ2TxJEmV2KDDn7r7MYyLiRK yJvXj4Q57Kio4y502we31bHxjzwCiHaTZUMEXR6fgVngaqQY1H/eIuWpIgAb9hqMV2oe l7Tw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fc21/mvY8yb5HJWqViPHABdN9LP2Zig6pUZR6g53N/s=; b=T2VaDJr5u67GbKXHqtFpOFMh1xhvN1CK1QR5QaPrE2Os9DvECV/EGZDeWxQMp4m1nz WcDYiIsqq/KtBhIMYQeC5RrnlYYVWAc90nRFKsIZsnaxkxog6HyrvUk7VssgrVid0EbZ zQtbDcV6fIy+Acu6fwKhHZkzbT2HjpRKt2w2vcW3MJ9+1+TaMdqfFOWW6pDBmTaysFGy ph624WZ1ygLYyJ+LNkul3gXlcjXe69WnjzKvliCWR4yNSWGgiDHH8Snia7qtGC+fzg2b a5uh1mAG5ZE97wRaBtOCHrt71iZg4BPb8AeoLAzIQH3Svk5TGzl7f8eGmyvYWDH3eixz ZrwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+vLYmm8nwHpJzPbfxZP/3mo5sOVIi7QV+2fOOvD97v6lk3Fh12 bWmcCBk+pBngnDN4UEV0/1zgNwD7Zr0UiyMQVkow9SCMc6Do0w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1shLOu7o6tCjNkbHNWlj4Mv4JG5F1U3Qb5dwRGLXI96GDhgGCPCgsYlXQhlxLZh9dhiqQitpupLOaRK5Wm5lXs= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:21c3:0:b0:3a2:fdba:3f39 with SMTP id h186-20020a1c21c3000000b003a2fdba3f39mr4727630wmh.194.1657758054677; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:20:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dave Taht Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:20:43 -0700 Message-ID: To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Starlink] starlink at sea X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:20:56 -0000 Two notes about this article https://www.royalcaribbeanblog.com/2022/06/28/i-tried-elon-musks-starlink-i= nternet-royal-caribbean-cruise-ship 1) Joy of joys they used the new ookla speedtest, which shows upload and download latency under load. 2) They show 6 starlink terminals on one side of the ship, and 6 on the other side (unless it's a reversed image). While I can imagine that the downlink can manage that many terminals close by (but how?), I find it hard to conceive that the uplinks can co-exist emitting that much energy so few feet apart. Are modern phased arrays that good? Has anyone experimented with how closely placed two terminals can be? --=20 FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_code= l/ Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC