From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DA223B29E
 for <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun,  6 Feb 2022 12:23:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id og43so11651221ejc.0
 for <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:23:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=eg4hGt96xqS+/PuIaIAAfUx7IA84zU7VjzOtDJUpJmc=;
 b=C982hsM+Y9jvRdEmSwuCSzQPNcK1ZbDdDAFHsNtWP0QCT3fL9PoEUsdAE0aeavWw3J
 HIjW8ZP/hB7+5mjwTVusVBtZb0YLU19igj6GG2yi4mgJpmpJYew5LRL1UDplaKKnqkdI
 muMzk99ttUnf25IixVLED7bdJEKf34Quc++j0d7bpla7G/uQi5yKZDLKq0Ohnwqtwyre
 vQj+GzpXJJE8CouFJ/Kj+Y4WOAX4WVlWzbVz7A1ihlKFGBihJidhU1D8hQ8I/H1ONcjS
 GZat0RJd5807Yp4RI1c2rQeKtGWA2c7VJoHjjkAB+sWBSo3Gtfq2xp1deGgLVbtjpMIp
 aZMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=eg4hGt96xqS+/PuIaIAAfUx7IA84zU7VjzOtDJUpJmc=;
 b=1bPIBuOMJYIqCFplqvkEqh8RT3gt7hlJVksONFPydh5GHfHbsK8p80LLxSwDVsv/h4
 nJeZQO3K8yS2xG3KNFN87WCKDhVWDOJ90azL5r0iyYRRzah6PYVy9lXApandVN418QzX
 fDyEUGezkHm6qpDTNVFw9Galb6LeXBikMlvCPj8WgObFqAwsPhU+prJ9VuPvXRKgtBoA
 cr0H/mwotjFhZkk5x2ITIIJbHMaS4GFknyteNYjLQ4y6bbd8Vid+KiiWJuGmNWMYKZcT
 4ydsu/+J6WiNz6A/8UTQIQ/+LrUXGUpTycGDjx1RzH0mdgoe3RIrjeI4TxvoRkQFVKnF
 WeXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qdTnkKqoyCQuzkXUc1tUdhMFepngITdMypEGHFgX1Q23nW3j7
 P6d38Oypm1S3/wvuPJjpr8fvKaHUmWFZgun+pDtp6G2dO/f9cQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwnJcIbEKCOMRddJxZy5cweJ0PzVFg9KkLxEsJTBO6zU95lWy36nugE5CE7lzzhcElx3upw6Po5gzfjEJpzKIU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:35cd:: with SMTP id
 p13mr1087633ejb.666.1644168205685; 
 Sun, 06 Feb 2022 09:23:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 09:23:14 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6uioyEDHyXXz-ZCSBw-m53Xep7tX8-2P9ZtFkjmLUHzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Starlink] My NTAI broadband filing
X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." <starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink>
List-Post: <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2022 17:23:27 -0000

The NTIA put out an RFC asking for how to spend $70B properly, so I
wrote up a brief submission, submitted yesterday, to try and broaden
the debate to have metrics more than average "speed".

Starlink fans will be thrilled at how much better than a tethered cell
phone starlink presently is, under load.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FjRo9MNnVOLh733SNPNyqaR1IFee7Q5qbMrmW1P=
lPr8/edit#

It could still be so much better. I do often wish that instead of
focusing on bandwidth, starlink optimizing to provide consistently low
latency 50Mbits per subscriber instead might let them increase
subscriber density, with the only disappointed ones being speedtest
freaks.


--=20
I tried to build a better future, a few times:
https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org

Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC