From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4201E3B29D for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 17:46:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id r29so3083207wra.13 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:46:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679694380; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sc5bLivQimwPM0EGI/JhiyGidW07oQvaifbTZnmpVsA=; b=K8MNNygqjey2i+ZPBUAnGzQlqXdtK1ahK9gJ4s0eynh8tTgKAnYisbKLWKBac1FSXj b4otOUUa5Ou7ZqfisggRp2RagB95AKVBjYT068m+5HgF/zbHf7S6n07oHac+c35d6aO3 F6BMG+sDgtMy1zhYT6WCscjiFVYeukcnnb3GczUiiW+2uMTxBUEM/1JvGOy7NYKriClN A0PVd5T2SLf0BOyf/w38mVr7U190Ayoa12WrO9LGBvSdZVc5hV9/Gbb8M9KBhUvKpLL5 cHeJgy2op1UdyVLTvKz2NBJL6nxmYeM3G4d9BTN536ycsMSmpJSvLfbTwky9o0XkMBPV oS8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679694380; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=sc5bLivQimwPM0EGI/JhiyGidW07oQvaifbTZnmpVsA=; b=EhmjqGx2a2//pPcvZsBPC3AVF7j6zkVKPm55+n9Mzn83h7Ucsy87OMA2AVQiPpRAF1 2PXsYvaKwGwR3TrxHPPUbZzb7PyPvMhbXo/oP9oksAOSmjbiv1rk74jIkO40XNIoXzX7 +adWV2UE+7IB+0JXNrzKUoS9/wj66+HMMf4De+eFyQaOhxkqqwFEPi+y8yCKH63SHt39 C3S+TPygwIKwaRu0nXcDEz97Ng2aH1eOpobSmfnwjt4cVpao5cuQOxcqzh7+aOHopCQK cU78zmWILDa+7GLiYKz22PoV7nN0m2nQCZQLVS7ZYhTQqTFgHBrLYp5dwI940GI8RwxV ooWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9e9XCShdR2qu/rsqTooaHKaOs8MLK027bLv6tddW+zcvKaf7tuw pNTPYCGfLh6PEbGRvx/JghXp5l4ZOjsRQ4HsJdsAyMaVubwk4A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bVdPaACV8N0+lKXv/Vya3OpDojCzuWt2r4A2FgNvLSxnETKaHJ/yDTqMrMnTWfKzhvDnWraB7rewxOG33u30w= X-Received: by 2002:adf:db4b:0:b0:2ce:ac97:6f51 with SMTP id f11-20020adfdb4b000000b002ceac976f51mr754993wrj.13.1679694379992; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:46:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dave Taht Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:46:08 -0700 Message-ID: To: Dave Taht via Starlink Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Starlink] Starlink ISL data X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 21:46:22 -0000 Vint just asked me a difficult question over here about the performance of the ISL links for my upcoming AMA next week https://twitter.com/mtaht/status/1639361656106156032 And to date, we really don't know. We do know it is up!? but... has anyone managed to measure p2p ipv6 performance starlink to starlink over an ISL link as yet? Do we know anyone at the poles? In general I always look for flent and irtt data, but I'd settle for a, oh, call it 5-10 minute long packet capture of single iperf flow, running over tcp cubic (bbr would be great too).... one test in each direction. (in fact that would be great from any starlink terminal to any of my servers around the world) I have some data from a couple of you (thx ulrich in particular!), but I have not sat down to take it apart as I have been far, far too busy with libreqos and a bunch of nice, small, competent ISPs deploying that, to worry about fixing a billionaire's network all that much.... but I've set aside next week to answer AMAs about everything from all and sundry, so if you got data, please share? --=20 Come Heckle Mar 6-9 at: https://www.understandinglatency.com/ Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC