Yea. peak 2500ms latency on download, 600ms on upload, that's about right. :/ The upload figure appears to be a bit lower (better) than what I measured 1 year ago, here (for the 30 or so new subscribers on this list, this was why I started it): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1puRjUVxJ6cCv-rgQ_zn-jWZU9ae0jZbFATLf4PQKblM/edit I don't know if ookla are throwing out arp related stuff, or using the 99th percentile to calculate the final figure. I hope to learn more about their calculations in the coming weeks. I do keep hoping we can get more updated flent data over longer intervals than 20s. With starlink changing their allocation scheme every 15s, what number do you pick? And like I said, some packet caps of this app would be good, too. On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 4:07 PM Nathan Owens wrote: > Here's a test I did today: > https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/i/5112435305 > > > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 4:04 PM Dave Taht wrote: > >> Ookla has just put out an ios and android app that also continuously >> measures latency under load. >> >> I'm interested in calibrating the results of that vs a vs flent >> benchmarks verses starlink. Can someone here give this a shot? More >> details here: >> >> >> https://www.ookla.com/articles/introducing-loaded-latency >> >> IDEALLY, this would be over wifi -> starlink , with a packet capture >> in the middle. But I'd settle for a few test results from starlink >> folk of this new app, first. >> >> -- >> FQ World Domination pending: >> https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ >> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlink mailing list >> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >> > -- FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC