From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B9903B2A4 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 14:35:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id x18so5454371wrm.7 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:35:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=la83BMhPQp91i2siq4jvD2M7nkMmIJ2IYSwhoYItYcM=; b=AgQuXuheczIMslVQH+VMK9hSfNdGIk38BwzAPHSwPNnraiG8BJLBvciY5G58DisjT2 WrQz6RBdhN1gjMwGzKIxxadbz4ixT5ZzJfCzpuVP6MxUCj2U3BR8VWKoRI7MCkF8ggCp wEV4u9CtRBfxmDE3N35RkD3Ej6iHSKDcHG6NSun8gzeuta3DMBLuqfwGFiEnFvGUs13M 0mE+guWDwe1f47EbS+6KCgTv0kNrutLh1eQS+BMEaBiNW5YgsJGpHF4v/OkZKFj2KEZk Kv/BnwI4JcrMPb7kzqAmdD7GpY8zTDUyNjF/xahrHoEPCoSeJ4vx4rUQwjpZc2m1F4Hs DKBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=la83BMhPQp91i2siq4jvD2M7nkMmIJ2IYSwhoYItYcM=; b=msy4bigLR0SfEX8jiPyXhYlFX47TdjFD+rdZHflEfj/F9TFw0xe+UqL3fB15Dcjc6c 0480CtMZmwSQJvA7sR/zSg/zsT6ITdobWXm0XUyAa5uzkbxArApue9dDg0J10IEmZTmW Bje7OzRYaT2YZIPBNYwUN/p14OJ3Y+qBYfSKUUrmN90Om7gQ+jzNtPoHRU+V0RHTWrCy Mu58HWPqvx+LGCPOW1r464Qo846Ttm4te5Aq67whxuxEsXPDIZ7jA2NMot7PH3sqy3lx zpzMpDQIKaVcyKuNlBYA+M5C94FIJ3Zrret1iYHNIeBM112x6sQJKQWAAJ/cIx5eJh4T Dqyg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1GRx81UC8HV5ZKY4Bt5Xmr4p/GV6qqOFU07LHHUx6cc+Nliqly F5QYbNIglibBssw0Gr38znOQ+1bQrOIO3g55xzdPoKffbvY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6AoZ9N9mH/XKIkOQZor9VcPy1qxiGekk3gq6XFMsUb6BZHwX3ZAUbgWFcio4UVscrDvrBEnOkGlv7RobhqrCo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:18ab:b0:22a:3b4d:3a53 with SMTP id b11-20020a05600018ab00b0022a3b4d3a53mr18447669wri.482.1663785340846; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:35:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dave Taht Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:35:28 -0700 Message-ID: To: Dave Taht via Starlink Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Starlink] It's still the starlink latency... X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 18:35:42 -0000 I still find it remarkable that reporters are still missing the meaning of the huge latencies for starlink, under load. Just look at the https://www.pcmag.com/news/starlink-speeds-drop-significantly-in-the-us-ami= d-congestion-woes --=20 FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_code= l/ Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC