* [Starlink] ESA IRIS2 draft response
@ 2024-12-19 19:00 Dave Taht
2024-12-19 19:51 ` Brandon Butterworth
2024-12-20 18:19 ` Dave Taht
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2024-12-19 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht via Starlink
We decided to file a request for clarification on their "bufferbloat"
RFP, if anyone would like to contribute,
an early draft is here. H/T to dave cb for helping drive it along.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-9CB7r8Ks8CdYHPTKancLYWPfDPrJHMDsQ8JtXIXvEE/edit?usp=sharing
It's not due til 2/25/25, but I'd like to get it out this year. I
don't really know if we'll actually bid or not, and I just hit peak
pedant mode on both this and the NTIA bandwidth guidelines and need a
break. :( In particular I'd like to find examples of satcom
scheduling, to this day I have no idea how the request/grant (or
other) scheduling means are used at these rtts. My assumption for
starlink is that these assignments are coarse at the 15s level...
--
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Starlink] ESA IRIS2 draft response
2024-12-19 19:00 [Starlink] ESA IRIS2 draft response Dave Taht
@ 2024-12-19 19:51 ` Brandon Butterworth
2024-12-20 18:19 ` Dave Taht
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brandon Butterworth @ 2024-12-19 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht via Starlink
On 19/12/2024 19:00:33, "Dave Taht via Starlink"
<starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>We decided to file a request for clarification on their "bufferbloat"
>RFP,
Presuming this might lead to a bid should this also seek
clarification on locations the work can be carried out at,
either due to coverage of test satellites, locations they are
willing to ship test ground stations to, or ESA organisational
requirements (they may want the money spend in the EU).
May be also worth asking what ground station equipment will
be required or made available. It says there are more docs
behind the login, do you have them?
brandon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Starlink] ESA IRIS2 draft response
2024-12-19 19:00 [Starlink] ESA IRIS2 draft response Dave Taht
2024-12-19 19:51 ` Brandon Butterworth
@ 2024-12-20 18:19 ` Dave Taht
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2024-12-20 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht via Starlink
Thank you all for your comments and suggestions!
I'm going to sleep on it til monday, and perhaps try to create a diagram or two.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 11:00 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We decided to file a request for clarification on their "bufferbloat"
> RFP, if anyone would like to contribute,
> an early draft is here. H/T to dave cb for helping drive it along.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-9CB7r8Ks8CdYHPTKancLYWPfDPrJHMDsQ8JtXIXvEE/edit?usp=sharing
>
> It's not due til 2/25/25, but I'd like to get it out this year. I
> don't really know if we'll actually bid or not, and I just hit peak
> pedant mode on both this and the NTIA bandwidth guidelines and need a
> break. :( In particular I'd like to find examples of satcom
> scheduling, to this day I have no idea how the request/grant (or
> other) scheduling means are used at these rtts. My assumption for
> starlink is that these assignments are coarse at the 15s level...
>
> --
> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
--
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-20 18:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-19 19:00 [Starlink] ESA IRIS2 draft response Dave Taht
2024-12-19 19:51 ` Brandon Butterworth
2024-12-20 18:19 ` Dave Taht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox