Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Starlink] ESA IRIS2 draft response
@ 2024-12-19 19:00 Dave Taht
  2024-12-19 19:51 ` Brandon Butterworth
  2024-12-20 18:19 ` Dave Taht
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2024-12-19 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Taht via Starlink

We decided to file a request for clarification on their "bufferbloat"
RFP, if anyone would like to contribute,
an early draft is here. H/T to dave cb for helping drive it along.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-9CB7r8Ks8CdYHPTKancLYWPfDPrJHMDsQ8JtXIXvEE/edit?usp=sharing

It's not due til 2/25/25, but I'd like to get it out this year.  I
don't really know if we'll actually bid or not, and I just hit peak
pedant mode on both this and the NTIA bandwidth guidelines and need a
break. :( In particular I'd like to find examples of satcom
scheduling, to this day I have no idea how the request/grant (or
other) scheduling means are used at these rtts. My assumption for
starlink is that these assignments are coarse at the 15s level...

-- 
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-20 18:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-19 19:00 [Starlink] ESA IRIS2 draft response Dave Taht
2024-12-19 19:51 ` Brandon Butterworth
2024-12-20 18:19 ` Dave Taht

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox