From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com (mail-il1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E0423CB41 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 10:24:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id v5so12535727ilo.5 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 07:24:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1mN69sFvyth61aBdhbpWKVtUgFSEcXJVk1S4ayhJeLQ=; b=FwQM6sFLGYF/G2lWJmGRs/iyJ7mPiO5Ofl2U2TjJBN524akyTi8PnpMypO1ax12u71 FCj0GY4IYWLr2QXZXqRAX/Jgn1Vz+6ahHmFrjHrtbKTaNBZl6mxxFFfySp/D1Z/j2Unu SA7Ce2GQCe5XBEtJ0ejI1uWCWZKqrMAeVuDM0IoHTRm5sVeTlNk+3NQg1WfKzeEaekPu 2BC9lTuTs8BzZK31wSqq4uDL8ur4RcjJg3MSq+beNgw+K8cRfVeJXEtZijczQPg5Rzrh K2Jr6kSjG6p+FG1GpdBwV7Eqo2yQCAvWj50+2T2ChvgBP9gk7+dYfNsduaqlKYLE4KDK 679Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1mN69sFvyth61aBdhbpWKVtUgFSEcXJVk1S4ayhJeLQ=; b=YtxvXhE8exYZLAqSq/yo1HpDjX73ho3GzXytI5RgMneeAgo4579x15Bb+AuTNMPp/6 nHXk5QEJ3SxEsphB2cwMUHjjFGjFbeg1RZ3HhWnMna5XNO4zWiK2qjV+wJmzvoE4b0kz Ky4YSKatjlqe/iphRRYD+bVNBGQI3picQVtUzESuv2KknvG4f9k/7TpZN4wmt+otOoSu sAjQKxrFKw3MrjZx4PdOJJzfYw20emMqH0JoFgPlt5RUTz/isYnkuQOYM44hl6eSd8n+ 5wJE4LUlk7oEKOmZSkSAID8IwB01qCdB1ld34MDwwhzWer7iUmSvOJ5VxEk36cGlCJas MMVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532XBoCp+uPltDB2Ze4XRjocWcxkqnhmIclCQiNXAfQRejN15tKT Kya1uQgE7c0y0bZ6QL3cJZwqgsG6mBvNE98pVAo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyJuJZe13gEdFrCUfb0vkYz0xSUxZC0RnDQWH5v3QC0T2dfFClSEjA1OXil+ZUQxqdFRHOZ7AJi+wub7d3nnk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:d2:: with SMTP id r18mr11190881ilq.249.1624717489744; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 07:24:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7664DBDE-5049-498A-9C40-4CF17FA2D488@puck.nether.net> In-Reply-To: <7664DBDE-5049-498A-9C40-4CF17FA2D488@puck.nether.net> From: Dave Taht Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 07:24:38 -0700 Message-ID: To: Jared Mauch Cc: Nathan Owens , starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink throughput / bufferbloat change? X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 14:24:50 -0000 I have fired off a new string of tests. should be done in an hour. I don't know if budic has sqm on or off at the moment. On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 7:10 AM Jared Mauch wrote: > > I will be able to test perhaps in 6-10 hours as I'll be getting the syste= m online hopefully. > > Sent from my TI-99/4a > > > On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Nathan Owens wrote: > > > > =EF=BB=BF > > I'm on vacation, so I can't do a ton of testing, but it seems like in t= he last ~2 days, my DL speeds are lower (<160Mbps, generally 90-110Mbps), b= ut download-induced bufferbloat is also greatly reduced (Latency generally = <60ms, with small spikes up to maybe 150ms more rarely -- much better than= to up to 400ms I was seeing before). > > > > I confirmed the same behavior with one other list member, has anyone el= se seen similar? > > > > --Nathan > > _______________________________________________ > > Starlink mailing list > > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink --=20 Latest Podcast: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/ Dave T=C3=A4ht CTO, TekLibre, LLC