* [Starlink] for those new to the starlink list
@ 2021-10-29 2:00 Dave Taht
2021-10-29 2:07 ` Dave Taht
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2021-10-29 2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: starlink
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2449 bytes --]
I'd presented the bufferbloat data here to some starlink folk back in june:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1puRjUVxJ6cCv-rgQ_zn-jWZU9ae0jZbFATLf4PQKblM/edit#
We made the flent data publicly available via rsync here, all sorts of
details if you want to check it out via flent.
cd yourbaredir
rsync -av fremont.starlink.taht.net::starlink .
But given they seemed to be stalling out vs a vs manufacturing and as
I was buried by my apple gig, and low on students, I put it down.
Since then I have a team doing rfc3168, with viasat and starlink sims,
looking at bbrv2, and doing higher res measurements. On no budget,
sigh. Recently there's been some progress on dynamically reconfiguring
sch_cake via a couple sensing methods, but it was my hope then, as
now, that starlink made fixing the bloat a priority.
with 6 upload streams, sep 4th :
./irtt client --dscp=0xfe -i5ms -d30s fremont.starlink.taht.net -q
--timer=hybrid
[Connecting] connecting to fremont.starlink.taht.netrtt
[45.79.113.72:2112] [Connected] connection established
[45.79.113.72:2112] [WaitForPackets] waiting 1.01s for final packets
Min Mean Median Max Stddev
--- ---- ------ --- ------
RTT 47.91ms 95.28ms 94.41ms 337.9ms 20.33ms
send delay 22.77ms 60.92ms 56.67ms 309.8ms 19.77ms
receive delay 24ms 34.36ms 28.34ms 59.9ms 7.51ms
IPDV (jitter) 1.88ms 5.09ms 4.98ms 112.3ms 3ms
send IPDV 30.5µs 4.96ms 4.93ms 119.4ms 2.99ms
receive IPDV 9ns 272µs 45.8µs 17.64ms 1.25ms
send call time 9.72µs 23.5µs 89.9µs 14.8µs
timer error 0s 86.9µs 610µs 114µs
server proc. time 620ns 7.39µs 66.7µs 7.06µs
We've been using the high-res (3ms) probing technique to take apart
some 4g and 5g realities, also, but the starlink one was fascinating.
You can
clearly see them adjusting the network every 15ms, all sorts of
(beamforming?) artifacts, the 400ms bufferbloat spike from a speedtest
mountain about 1/3 of the way through... and I keep hoping we attract
two people to that sub-project with dishy's in the same cell.
[plots courtesy of nathan]
--
Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9gLo6Xrwgw
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
[-- Attachment #2: starlink-3ms-irtt-20min (2).png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 2013513 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Starlink] for those new to the starlink list
2021-10-29 2:00 [Starlink] for those new to the starlink list Dave Taht
@ 2021-10-29 2:07 ` Dave Taht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2021-10-29 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: starlink
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 7:00 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'd presented the bufferbloat data here to some starlink folk back in june:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1puRjUVxJ6cCv-rgQ_zn-jWZU9ae0jZbFATLf4PQKblM/edit#
>
> We made the flent data publicly available via rsync here, all sorts of
> details if you want to check it out via flent.
>
> cd yourbaredir
> rsync -av fremont.starlink.taht.net::starlink .
>
> But given they seemed to be stalling out vs a vs manufacturing and as
> I was buried by my apple gig, and low on students, I put it down.
>
> Since then I have a team doing rfc3168, with viasat and starlink sims,
> looking at bbrv2, and doing higher res measurements. On no budget,
> sigh. Recently there's been some progress on dynamically reconfiguring
> sch_cake via a couple sensing methods, but it was my hope then, as
> now, that starlink made fixing the bloat a priority.
>
> with 6 upload streams, sep 4th :
>
> ./irtt client --dscp=0xfe -i5ms -d30s fremont.starlink.taht.net -q
> --timer=hybrid
> [Connecting] connecting to fremont.starlink.taht.netrtt
> [45.79.113.72:2112] [Connected] connection established
> [45.79.113.72:2112] [WaitForPackets] waiting 1.01s for final packets
>
> Min Mean Median Max Stddev
> --- ---- ------ --- ------
> RTT 47.91ms 95.28ms 94.41ms 337.9ms 20.33ms
> send delay 22.77ms 60.92ms 56.67ms 309.8ms 19.77ms
> receive delay 24ms 34.36ms 28.34ms 59.9ms 7.51ms
>
> IPDV (jitter) 1.88ms 5.09ms 4.98ms 112.3ms 3ms
> send IPDV 30.5µs 4.96ms 4.93ms 119.4ms 2.99ms
> receive IPDV 9ns 272µs 45.8µs 17.64ms 1.25ms
>
> send call time 9.72µs 23.5µs 89.9µs 14.8µs
> timer error 0s 86.9µs 610µs 114µs
> server proc. time 620ns 7.39µs 66.7µs 7.06µs
>
> We've been using the high-res (3ms) probing technique to take apart
> some 4g and 5g realities, also, but the starlink one was fascinating.
> You can
> clearly see them adjusting the network every 15ms, all sorts of
15s I meant.
smells like IS-IS.
I really prefer DV protocols....
> (beamforming?) artifacts, the 400ms bufferbloat spike from a speedtest
> mountain about 1/3 of the way through... and I keep hoping we attract
> two people to that sub-project with dishy's in the same cell.
>
> [plots courtesy of nathan]
>
>
> --
> Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9gLo6Xrwgw
>
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
--
Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9gLo6Xrwgw
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-29 2:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-29 2:00 [Starlink] for those new to the starlink list Dave Taht
2021-10-29 2:07 ` Dave Taht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox