From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Adam Thompson <athompson@merlin.mb.ca>
Cc: "starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] VPN woes, recommendations?
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:34:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7o8pGLzKUR2CrWWm1hcJ37X-GmSoeTav+L+ryUHcQ5oQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YQBPR0101MB89254CCAC6EB4DB67D5BD6C59BA19@YQBPR0101MB8925.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
The big winners over starlink have been wireguard and zerotier.
+ https://github.com/lynxthecat/cake-autorate#cake-with-adaptive-bandwidth---autorate
finally hit the big 2.0 mark a few days ago.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 8:30 AM Adam Thompson via Starlink
<starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> Hi, all.
> We've been trying to develop a plug-and-play L2 VPN over Starlink, using Aruba Hospitality-series Remote APs like their RAP-505H.
> It's not going great, and I'm wondering about several Starlink-specific issues.
>
> First, having multiple devices in serial is generally not a great idea for reliability. Can we realistically plug our remote AP directly into the dish, still? (This is using Starlink Business, FWIW.). I know we lose access to the Starlink app, but we also lose a NATing router and an unwanted wifi AP, so that's probably a net zero. I just don't know what other dangers/problems that topology might cause.
>
> Secondly, we're only able to push about 30Mbps through the (magical Aruba-proprietary GRE+IPsec) tunnel. The bandwidth-delay equations suggest we should be seeing around 100Mbps, not 30. (The Aruba devices are rated for ~2Gbps encrypted at the site end, and ~7Gbps at the head end, so presumably that's not the bottleneck.)
>
> So:
> * does anyone have corroborating *or* contradicting evidence of VPN performance over Starlink's particular flavor of Long Fat Pipe, and
> * does anyone have any positive (or negative, I guess!) recommendations for cloud-managed VPN devices that can do at least 100M and magically work from behind double-NAT/CGNAT like we see with Starlink? Bonus points if it does L2 tunnels or can run a dynamic routing protocol.
> * Other comments or suggestions welcome, too.
>
> Thanks,
> -Adam
>
> Get Outlook for Android
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
--
Surveillance Capitalism? Or DIY? Choose:
https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/an_upgrade_in_place/
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-17 16:30 Adam Thompson
2023-02-17 16:34 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2023-02-17 16:36 ` Daniel C. Eckert
2023-02-17 16:38 ` Adam Thompson
2023-02-17 16:39 ` Adam Thompson
2023-02-17 16:45 ` Dave Taht
2023-02-17 17:38 ` Adam Thompson
2023-02-17 17:40 ` Dave Taht
2023-02-17 16:47 ` Nathan Owens
2023-02-17 18:29 ` Michael Richardson
2023-02-17 21:01 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw7o8pGLzKUR2CrWWm1hcJ37X-GmSoeTav+L+ryUHcQ5oQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=athompson@merlin.mb.ca \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox