Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Ricky Mok <cskpmok@caida.org>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] new subscribers to this list
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 12:07:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7otRPRS=OeCqyE7JZEcSCCJ9Mb2Q=kHUt7_Upb7dfdDA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7ac05bc-6495-d6e5-6a52-02e2d6f3d290@caida.org>

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 11:44 AM Ricky Mok <cskpmok@caida.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks Dave for creating and managing this mailing list!

and: thank *you* (and kc, dave clark, et al)  for this really
excellent paper on "jitterbug". Quality jitter metrics have long been
lacking on the internet.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-98785-5_7

"We discovered a set of features in jitter and jitter dispersion —a
jitter-derived time series we define in this paper—time series that
are characteristic of periods of congestion. We leverage these
concepts to create a jitter-based congestion inference framework that
we call Jitterbug. We apply Jitterbug’s capabilities to a wide range
of traffic scenarios and discover that Jitterbug can correctly
identify both recurrent and one-off congestion events. We validate
Jitterbug inferences against state-of-the-art autocorrelation-based
inferences of recurrent congestion. We find that the two approaches
have strong congruity in their inferences, but Jitterbug holds promise
for detecting one-off as well as recurrent congestion."

It looks very promising. Is the code anywhere? Is the talk up?

... and where do you plan to go next with it? Are any other groups
beginning to leverage it?

> Ricky
>

-- 
Still trying to fix the internet on a too-small budget:
https://www.patreon.com/dtaht
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-21 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-21 18:36 Dave Täht
2022-04-21 18:43 ` Ricky Mok
2022-04-21 19:07   ` Dave Taht [this message]
2022-04-21 20:18     ` Ricky Mok

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw7otRPRS=OeCqyE7JZEcSCCJ9Mb2Q=kHUt7_Upb7dfdDA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cskpmok@caida.org \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox