From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 668F63B2A4 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:12:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5d3dce16a3dso7724245a12.1 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 07:12:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1737472333; x=1738077133; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pyiLN9hYa2SCTvWwZ4rAYpLtwR1mE37Div3XVoJUOYg=; b=YwXCysGljuybfSUiwpj4uAjiSaZznSLSKjKMaKQGU815vily+JgP2OWvn7YtmrTqLS NbM+uGa8fKUb0dU9Hlt348IKDVm3lz5r39PcZk5Yq3h9g9R80aJe/0WaEFjNqc6HCo/G s2wwLi/29IipLIf64yZG01UVcWqT7hM4veMz33WKL+iazKtsAFWh5LGa7JTJB4Y5cbUe IUe9vD2HrstNUKmD6uY5fSaIiNAA4SwwNmaHIpbWRQzdSV/ZS1Ym43katqOPzXHZ58HC 4xEl4NTmECrcVjV8gQ7P1yDWivuXTCBW2O5WFSPW0clNnZdvojhOs43pQy7Zlgu+oCRw 302g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737472333; x=1738077133; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=pyiLN9hYa2SCTvWwZ4rAYpLtwR1mE37Div3XVoJUOYg=; b=Rc82dBkyfZygLeGtbj8tc8uhNSPq/VhMiTc1rIbg40VAHsGewkKrFSzKa5Yi8yq37/ CVnkbF2JYgltwxlh0opgBtDQ/FP/Ur/aX3E/WIqYvb5Qx7ftGRRnqnAIDun0gUYzB951 kBelOM3xsyKg7hKiC3R8+6VLJqbMKTNBjQ/N5tBZkdNI5mkGX/YjWAy7n3fbRJANgyCT xEnvYWVHLxfPaYzFRYJTiiQ5R7UZitWwJRYcvrU1gQ955FJWzbglpJhUhsXoT2k2qcSW xagYauWonSnmuAiZVEfE00F6j1lXO1tHUVRUI6fz1B6N1JpuzoMYoKYDNMW1FBoNuhQ8 DHGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx6GuEHYxOWeHrgdaaqWoZCrftjSoCc/V/l7/Yxq6xgVFcoOim7 6kTojH26NoarTJy/zazDxvdt79dveqXQc+ZUwp9C8vqFp/BQn0eRt/mQrLxlKE2NDXuvqSYm43f swVYX/LsK99OvN+KvDRCmZxsOOUXnZg== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsfQNU6LUbzsYIzJeLezl9XujxLTpSjHf211+A+S/uJBkv2eVwackKbsE8iK+J B9+UcfUG05J4XN2AGpF/Pv5dbfcoxCLF4MPSD3EY+19p/EFaD8sU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG/r4/Fqo9vhvE6Hans5rdwSLu2zS/WLxOOPAhKOo+pjkdYxAY5mBqL/Gx2SYHqaQ+DtG+ANwncC1fcGS94apU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:510b:b0:5d9:6633:8eb1 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5da0c35d5a2mr22408722a12.14.1737472333054; Tue, 21 Jan 2025 07:12:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <269839o2-003o-1756-8r28-3on7q7nsrn54@ynat.uz> In-Reply-To: <269839o2-003o-1756-8r28-3on7q7nsrn54@ynat.uz> From: "b. angel" Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 07:12:04 -0800 X-Gm-Features: AbW1kvaqr6fayUxx_lHwFE1ttwemK_JD8QEBYVuxecIucfgrRfCqgKNoRWHTVLo Message-ID: To: David Lang Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000380d1f062c38cd1a" Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink and VPN X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 15:12:14 -0000 --000000000000380d1f062c38cd1a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" David, I gave up on open VPN and starlink a while ago. I've implemented wireguard tunnels with success and reliability. Keith On Mon, Jan 20, 2025, 23:25 David Lang via Starlink < starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > has anyone done any work with openvpn over starlink (especially if they > got the > connectors to completely bypass the router)? > > I've got the basic connectivity working, but am having problems trying to > get > openvpn to work (especially for traffic back through the cgnat to the > router on > the starlink side) > > the logs on the client are reporting link local: (not bound) when trying > UDP, > when I try TCP (and clamp the mtu low) I can connect from the starlink > side (st > least sometimes) but cannot get the routing the other way to work > > David Lang > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > --000000000000380d1f062c38cd1a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
David,

I gav= e up on open VPN and starlink a while ago. I've implemented wireguard t= unnels with success and reliability.=C2=A0

Keith

On Mon, Jan 20, 2025, 2= 3:25 David Lang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
has anyone done any work with openvpn over starlink (esp= ecially if they got the
connectors to completely bypass the router)?

I've got the basic connectivity working, but am having problems trying = to get
openvpn to work (especially for traffic back through the cgnat to the route= r on
the starlink side)

the logs on the client are reporting link local: (not bound) when trying UD= P,
when I try TCP (and clamp the mtu low) I can connect from the starlink side= (st
least sometimes) but cannot get the routing the other way to work

David Lang
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/sta= rlink
--000000000000380d1f062c38cd1a--