From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa1-x32.google.com (mail-oa1-x32.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7355D3CB37 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 03:34:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-oa1-x32.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-13bd2aea61bso11947094fac.0 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:34:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=SJZXawhOD72kBilQX/U0hlc8vK8wTkTE7dKkHJ2hW6w=; b=ot6yMv/0nU+ajOLeUwfnmV2Z4vfWZTyznUjUsjSx3JzkBW9cHvb+tS0le+qTj4bqsu 5XkG+DCPy2PUd72xhaJaXfRTryzVMT6PNYyWTvW6gmQ4GRIx+BeewttmLZ+LW5Ng+kdZ SPCelGV0kg7nPqjR51LAPF4th4SueVRMwIy9lPzEhZQlqmDCQymZMF6q7A2GOdIAWsso HLXe9NnYqIEgg5COM7N5ACQ2M1R2gUZ5kehRgRK3PmpUty/qB8I7Yuu1deRmShVIeJO0 jypcHx4Q5edajJ1rkdwCCZJVoYjASaPBkAzKWLijiTs/xntvZ1yjGlN+YvVITf0HuX+V mt3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SJZXawhOD72kBilQX/U0hlc8vK8wTkTE7dKkHJ2hW6w=; b=iLKGBsqpnxOeeNo6gsO/f8EyAt9Oc0iLWiF0jHtAk1Wp310eVeUx/BmqgqWNqKFEEq hXU52PnrU3QPFVvBvhPGkybOb5JuoPxILxfUlM2Zga2p8LshI0pxnBIGRv3wdDAPRKFj YDRLuq+xMiIU5w5sqDnkXPXlIPfXBj/EWhPgSpHL50k7d8Grd4u0r29nbg3ZzrOW9IE3 ldZreqCe3O4r/JQDvG6EynCdaBJVI7Wej6IF5w/Zs2c+Q7Z8dQAjPjvMY7bIuGvun4qm rnx4kJpkdsgXvzgahAIsXFthftr+zS+uO6g0/NamaeBRJqBkSrd0D5QObTOTwVA2Mw+x AaSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1Dxn8VLyECrZMZPGg/lLZ/k/1g12HPrQLxDtgnsOcG7330qAIw jhfzjeTKlKKwrka83856BOQq7h8eXqFT3VFQ50dmxJuMmWUWoA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5iLzfCtMuZgbezhcUVRNhJHur4jNa2NKjkOK9X5srF4QUJkzRGsJ2/ddMKLRS+BVnJ9VDQErV4NDxo/TBpxT8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:2487:b0:131:4fee:7c0c with SMTP id s7-20020a056870248700b001314fee7c0cmr28342861oaq.71.1667810044422; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:34:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:6358:7e4e:b0:dc:5c1d:769 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 00:34:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?David_Fern=C3=A1ndez?= Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 09:34:03 +0100 Message-ID: To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Starlink] Packet losses in a router X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 08:34:05 -0000 It is a refurbished Cisco 4000 ISR. Yes, it does not make sense at all. 2022-11-05 13:05 GMT+01:00, Gert Doering : > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 01:54:26PM +0100, David Fern=C3=A1ndez via Starli= nk > wrote: >> FYI: The issue with packet losses was solved after the router was >> properly synchronized using NTP, reaching up to 100 pps during 60 s >> without losses and latency < 20 ms. > > This makes even less sense than before... NTP is purely control-plane > and should never affect forwarding. What sort of device is this? > > Also, 100pps on a GigE link is close to "empty link" - a full GE link > with 1500 byte packets comes up to ~80000 pps... > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael > Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 >