Re: [Starlink] It's still the starlink latency...

["David Fernández" <davidfdzp@gmail.com>]

Another report, linked from the MIT one previously mentioned is also
very interesting. In page 29 it compiles a series of latency
measurement tools, including flent, that has been mentioned in this
list before:
https://www.bitag.org/latency-explained.php

2022-10-17 15:50 GMT+02:00, David Fernández <davidfdzp@gmail.com>:
> That MIT paper is really interesting, yes, thank you.
>
> Have you ever heard about the Network Performance Score (NPS), based
> on ETSI TR 103 559?
>
> That could be the kind of nutriscore equivalent for networks that they
> are searching for  on that paper.
>
> The NPS is proposed for 5G networks, but well, Starlink could be
> scored too, as 5G networks are mobile wireless Internet access
> networks, like Starlink.
>
> https://www.rohde-schwarz.com/nl/solutions/test-and-measurement/mobile-network-testing/network-performance-score/network-performance-score_250678.html
>
> Unfortunately, I am not aware of any tool, besides that one from R&S,
> to measure the NPS or the interactivity score of a network:
> https://www.rohde-schwarz.com/uk/solutions/test-and-measurement/mobile-network-testing/stories-insights/article-interactivity-test-concept-and-kpis-part-2-_253245.html
>
> I am aware only of similar tools to measure interactivity, such as
> these for TWAMP (RFC 5357):
> https://github.com/nokia/twampy
> https://github.com/tcaine/twamp
> https://github.com/emirica/twamp-protocol
>
> Then, the UDP ping: http://perform.wpi.edu/downloads/#udp
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
>> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:26:08 -0700
>> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
>> To: warren ponder <wponder11@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Mike Puchol <mike@starlink.sx>,  Dave Täht via Starlink
>> 	<starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> Subject: Re: [Starlink] It's still the starlink latency...
>> Message-ID:
>> 	<CAA93jw4V_3qmdcwMnTrRw0x18DSwds1OG1sh0aY3+aL+niSVEA@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>>
>> This MIT paper went by today. It's really good.
>>
>> https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4178804
>>
>>
>