From: "David Fernández" <davidfdzp@gmail.com>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] some post Starship launch thoughts
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 18:02:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC=tZ0qSdssqAMvNUnutvJhAo76D9_6GgSgf-otDJ6zNVqr5Fg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
> Probably the best summary of the problems encountered is here:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8q24QLXixo courtesy Scott Manley.
In Spanish, probably here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfB0moaiax4
Regards,
David
> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 07:12:24 -0700
> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> To: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Subject: [Starlink] some post Starship launch thoughts
> Message-ID:
> <CAA93jw564W-XbRP3sTzM_m93XCJKBLLXm99+d5Rwtow1HSkW2Q@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> I was down in starbase, tx for the week of the launch. It was a great
> time, 10s of thousands of people there, my hotel had some of the musk
> family staying, and had a party on the roof... I was there packing
> guitar photobombing "this machine kills vogons" everywhere I could.
>
> Probably the best summary of the problems encountered is here:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8q24QLXixo courtesy Scott Manley.
> The best video describing the reactions of everybody, is here:
> https://twitter.com/Erdayastronaut/status/1649141793508716583
>
> Also, I met a young lady that paints watercolors of rockets, her work
> is here: https://www.jadeboudreaux.com/
> (she gifted me a holographic raptor for my guitar, I gifted her a
> scarf from in return https://www.natashasilkart.com/# )
> (support your local artists! Hilariously none of my pictures from dusk
> came out on my camera, while jade painted away like mad)
>
> I was most impressed by losing 6 engines over the course of the
> flight... and none exploding. Modern sensor technology is amazing.
>
> Anyway, like most of the monday morning quarterbacks, thinking about
> the destruction of the pad, I had had two ideas that I would like to
> run by folk here:
>
> Everyone wants a water deluge system and flame diverter, but I was
> thinking perhaps liquid nitrogen, as a natural byproduct of LOX
> liquification, might be used rather than water? It starts off quite a
> bit cooler... but as for its ability to cushion shock waves vs a vs
> its vapor point, no idea. ? Anyone?
>
> Secondly tuning the shockwaves against the pad (somehow), might limit
> the vibrative (is that a word) force? A slower start of the motors
> might damage the pad less, also.
>
> Landing and then taking off from the moon or mars look rather
> problematic at the moment!
>
> It looks to me as though everything can be repaired in a matter of
> months, and there is a watercooled plate designed for the pad that
> will go in next time. The nextgen rocket has replaced some hydraulics
> with electric motors. That said, it seems like the day where the
> starlink v2 sats can launch on starship is at least a year, maybe 2-3
> off, and that means we will see more of the v2 minis being flown on
> falcon. Does anyone have a good summary of the capabilities of the v2
> minis vs a vs 1.5? Any updated numbers on userbase?
>
> --
> AMA March 31: https://www.broadband.io/c/broadband-grant-events/dave-taht
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
>
>
next reply other threads:[~2023-04-24 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-24 16:02 David Fernández [this message]
[not found] <mailman.798.1682383621.1222.starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2023-04-25 20:40 ` David P. Reed
2023-04-25 21:31 ` Sauli Kiviranta
2023-04-25 22:37 ` David Lang
2023-05-11 16:24 ` Sauli Kiviranta
2023-04-25 22:33 ` David Lang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-04-24 14:12 Dave Taht
2023-04-24 15:16 ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-24 15:27 ` Dave Taht
2023-04-24 15:37 ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-24 15:49 ` Nathan Owens
2023-04-24 19:03 ` David Lang
2023-04-24 19:16 ` David Lang
2023-04-25 0:46 ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-25 2:20 ` David Lang
2023-04-25 22:31 ` Bruce Perens
2023-04-25 23:04 ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-25 23:22 ` David Lang
2023-04-25 23:55 ` Eugene Y Chang
2023-04-26 19:14 ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-25 1:01 ` Bruce Perens
2023-04-26 19:29 ` Dave Taht
2023-04-26 20:05 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-04-26 20:41 ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-26 21:05 ` Eugene Y Chang
2023-04-26 22:15 ` Mark Handley
2023-04-26 21:10 ` Dave Taht
2023-04-26 21:26 ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-26 22:31 ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-26 22:38 ` Bruce Perens
2023-04-26 23:25 ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-27 3:44 ` David Lang
2023-04-27 14:09 ` Rodney W. Grimes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAC=tZ0qSdssqAMvNUnutvJhAo76D9_6GgSgf-otDJ6zNVqr5Fg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=davidfdzp@gmail.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox