From: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] The "reasons" that bufferbloat isn't a problem
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:37:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC_2qU8pnt4nxdoMF70vRKzdXF7dArEbYnjT9VrM6ihrgAvWOw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2bbb7c1f-f8bc-44eb-9348-7d82af8b4309@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 652 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:18 AM Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink <
starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> In a sense, one would be happy to have all the communication standards
> frozen so all is settled and universal interoperability is ensured for
> years. A little bit like bridges are there for hundreds of years,
> except some, of course.
>
I'm actually glad we aren't forcing our DOTs and cities to still build
bridges as they were 100 years ago, never mind how they were 200 (or 300)
years ago! There are some old bridges still around, but they are
certainly performing the duty (carrying the load) of our modern bridges!
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 966 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-06 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-05 14:46 David Fernández
2024-06-05 14:57 ` Vint Cerf
2024-06-06 17:12 ` Michael Richardson
2024-06-06 10:18 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2024-06-06 10:37 ` Aidan Van Dyk [this message]
2024-06-06 10:33 ` Alexandre Petrescu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-06-07 7:36 David Fernández
2024-06-05 15:16 David Fernández
2024-06-05 15:21 ` Bless, Roland (TM)
2024-06-05 15:32 ` David Fernández
2024-06-05 16:24 ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-06-06 23:10 ` Michael Richardson
2024-06-07 1:39 ` David Lang
2024-06-07 6:20 ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-06-07 17:41 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-06-07 17:51 ` David Lang
2024-06-07 20:09 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-06-08 1:53 ` David Lang
2024-06-05 16:23 ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-06-06 7:07 ` David Fernández
2024-06-06 7:41 ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-05-08 9:31 David Fernández
2024-05-07 12:13 David Fernández
2024-05-07 12:46 ` Dave Collier-Brown
2024-05-07 19:09 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-07 19:11 ` Dave Taht
2024-05-07 19:14 ` Jeremy Austin
2024-05-07 19:46 ` Dave Taht
2024-05-07 20:03 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-07 20:05 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-05-07 20:25 ` Eugene Y Chang
[not found] <mailman.2773.1714488060.1074.starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2024-04-30 18:05 ` [Starlink] It’s the Latency, FCC Colin_Higbie
2024-04-30 19:04 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-01 0:36 ` David Lang
2024-05-01 1:30 ` [Starlink] Itʼs " Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-01 1:52 ` Jim Forster
2024-05-01 3:59 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-01 4:12 ` David Lang
2024-05-01 18:51 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-01 19:18 ` David Lang
2024-05-01 21:12 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-01 21:27 ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-05-01 22:19 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-06 11:25 ` [Starlink] The "reasons" that bufferbloat isn't a problem Rich Brown
2024-05-06 12:11 ` Dave Collier-Brown
2024-05-07 0:43 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-07 12:05 ` Dave Collier-Brown
[not found] ` <CAJUtOOhH3oPDCyo=mk=kwzm5DiFp7OZPiFu+0MzajTQqps==_g@mail.gmail.com>
2024-05-06 19:47 ` Rich Brown
2024-05-07 0:38 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-05-07 10:50 ` Rich Brown
2024-05-08 1:48 ` Dave Taht
2024-05-08 7:58 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-05-08 8:01 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-05-08 18:29 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-06-04 18:19 ` Stuart Cheshire
2024-06-04 20:06 ` Sauli Kiviranta
2024-06-04 20:58 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-06-05 11:36 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2024-06-05 13:08 ` Aidan Van Dyk
2024-06-05 13:28 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2024-06-05 13:40 ` Gert Doering
2024-06-05 13:43 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2024-06-05 14:16 ` David Lang
2024-06-05 15:10 ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-06-05 16:21 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2024-06-05 19:17 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-06-04 23:03 ` Rich Brown
2024-06-06 17:51 ` Stuart Cheshire
2024-06-07 2:28 ` Dave Taht
2024-06-07 5:36 ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-06-07 7:51 ` Gert Doering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAC_2qU8pnt4nxdoMF70vRKzdXF7dArEbYnjT9VrM6ihrgAvWOw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=aidan@highrise.ca \
--cc=alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox