From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com (mail-pj1-x102c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 798513B29E for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 10:04:57 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2feae794508so853546a91.0 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 07:04:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1740668696; x=1741273496; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xzXqMGXLTeKsftm/vMfJdDJzQiyD3g4ruF46Onv4eNQ=; b=gJdrTP7dSx8s4kXP9TM9A1jMTqFS4MGnMk2uPXHbiFPEdhP4NKL9dtWudoru2CGXrL X/c73/ilIIOz4OnT8Kxi7FYnEvyp+eAzDroTbPy79uTlg/r0CY/7wc9R9HH2S87RXN15 lNu4PvVObvbnnvZEfD70FETYaIVAG9ExHZYpBaVjXQDgt7WaxJRKWj6rEALFXHs401lr XKhbxEQ6G6kpFvuD000O57mxTbKt5Ju90z5L3UxPAAWIcvMl1i430IREv+vWtgo9wS8Q jqHdmV8itOm79XSfPMMHJqCGegZ29G2PaweMSlrWz3j/VkKc9IypaEizgy+OXEg+EOdh nFCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740668696; x=1741273496; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=xzXqMGXLTeKsftm/vMfJdDJzQiyD3g4ruF46Onv4eNQ=; b=OzlH+yOQ92ToLB05QclHpaTfeABErB0beHhHjezmuIh74WlEgdt3yXPhgxC4atpZBC T1U498VhStzl2G+npo6gx8DiAHCmsAutekpZ3up2o5rHPKMqDBxlzKn0iw+UoADYo+C2 HHBUU1SDMSfp/2sLTU5ZfzEZHq2v73tuUdYCP8C6nTS63funkn9l3dxIOiKoNrcLx5yM nu9QCh4lJuDZV0DUIK89oCm1KcpRJ1xdZZaZw0FlQoZ3nXDxvutqWrllKDdJwP0HvL4d MjN4EkzUf9aDR2PD1WX4OgdnymuDvXHgE9LhL9Id/ZHwU0043nMGAFhCkMvlsKKM0HFT eY7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzHfd7esCTDbLsg99iGAxuxiK6JUeGI61CMKH2oNju6PcGZUQRe ovVa3YL8Vk9egR5BmtFeiIWhgsJrXa/kcVtlL44NehSi0IvDvsDdCZkPkIcpGZWpIZ0Za+NSrlA /BYBZltp2jMP/uzCxpbbvpYlOtxQ= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctigoKGZxSHaVjMo1qoJdL6IX88D7NS/DuGYcYLRtF91b35mPX8xUwcAGPaHgb Gx7C8d1bLouQkAL2TOS1lUuFljBRJZSFdQL6QBRcskka8a3XNen6tVzb5rreGVpz3gKyjKUQgR3 3LwEnAwstirfDW+yvFZbYgei4YDQXliwfsUcK0N4pN X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFrJ4iksdVFwaM3+DHPSA209R3wo1Kbn4H2L/HNYHIVMnxwa2/8hh1dXmMJzlyHfjI60YqMa8G3ueA1Jo9n/Ec= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:2403:b0:2fe:9ff7:a053 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2fe9ff7a20emr5330171a91.23.1740668696292; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 07:04:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Hesham ElBakoury Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 07:04:44 -0800 X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1Jrd0mIpBEtMFGXttEdFXSQgMUG7AEgXu3Eu28Nj-p__S3BeqDunb_UkZ5o Message-ID: To: Craig Polk Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink , 5grm-satellite@ieee.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005076eb062f210300" Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink in Northern Europe: A New Look at Stationary and In-motion Performance X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 15:04:57 -0000 --0000000000005076eb062f210300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Craig, No it is not my paper. It has interesting results that I would like others to see and provide feedback on. Hesham On Thu, Feb 27, 2025, 6:36=E2=80=AFAM Craig Polk wrote: > Hesham, > > Is this your paper? Are you submitting it for the WG to review as a > possible INGR Topic article? > > Best regards, > Craig > > ---- > Craig Polk, MSEE, MBA > Program Manager > Future Networks Tech Community | futurenetworks.ieee.org > 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016 > > Office: +1 > > 212-705-8926 | Mobile: +1 908-255-6568 > Email: c.polk@comsoc.org > Future Networks World Forum | https://fnwf.ieee.org/ > Connecting the Unconnected | https://ctu.ieee.org/ > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025, 12:01=E2=80=AFAM Hesham ElBakoury > wrote: > >> This paper [1] This paper evaluates the Flat High Performance (FHP) >> terminal's performance in Finland, Northern Europe. >> >> *Abstract* >> "Starlink has introduced the Flat High Performance (FHP) terminal, >> specifically designed to support the vehicles and the vessels in motion = as >> well as the high-demand stationary users. The research on FHP terminal >> throughput analysis remains limited, only a few existing studies evaluat= e >> FHP, focusing on the limited parameters and scenarios. This paper evalua= tes >> the FHP terminal's performance in Finland, Northern Europe. We examine >> round-trip time (RTT), uplink, and downlink throughput for both stationa= ry >> and in-motion use. We measure network efficiency across six geographical= ly >> diverse servers and get insights of network routing strategies. Our resu= lts >> show that Starlink provides high-speed, low-RTT connectivity, however, t= he >> throughput experiences fluctuations with slight degradation when in moti= on. >> Additionally, we compare Starlink and terrestrial network RTT and possib= le >> routing paths." >> >> Hesham >> [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15552 >> ------------------------------ >> >> To unsubscribe from the 5GRM-SATELLITE list, click the following link: >> https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=3D5GRM-SATELLITE&A=3D1 >> > --0000000000005076eb062f210300 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi=C2=A0Craig,
No it is not my paper.
It has interesting results that I would like others to= see and provide feedback on.

Hesham

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025, 6:36=E2=80=AF= AM Craig Polk <c.polk@comsoc.org> wrote:



On Thu, Feb 27, 2025, 12:01=E2=80=AFAM Hesham ElBakoury &l= t;helbakoury@gmail.com> wrote:
This paper [1] This paper evaluates the Flat High Pe= rformance (FHP) terminal's performance in Finland, Northern Europe.
Abstract
"Starlink has introduced the Flat High Performance (FHP) = terminal, specifically designed to support the vehicles and the vessels in = motion as well as the high-demand stationary users. The research on FHP ter= minal throughput analysis remains limited, only a few existing studies eval= uate FHP, focusing on the limited parameters and scenarios. This paper eval= uates the FHP terminal's performance in Finland, Northern Europe. We ex= amine round-trip time (RTT), uplink, and downlink throughput for both stati= onary and in-motion use. We measure network efficiency across six geographi= cally diverse servers and get insights of network routing strategies. Our r= esults show that Starlink provides high-speed, low-RTT connectivity, howeve= r, the throughput experiences fluctuations with slight degradation when in = motion. Additionally, we compare Starlink and terrestrial network RTT and p= ossible routing paths."

Hesham

To unsubscribe from the 5GRM-SATELLITE list, click the following link: = https://listserv.ie= ee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=3D5GRM-SATELLITE&A=3D1

--0000000000005076eb062f210300--