Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Schien <Daniel.Schien@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: Vint Cerf <vint=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>,
	tom@evslin.com,  Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>,
	starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	e-impact@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Starlink] [E-impact] DataCenters in Space (was Re: fiber IXPs in space)
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 04:10:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFvDQ9rDML2NGD09=mOTJ_g34obP+3_oz=z+NQUyxQCgUgHGeQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB9PR06MB8843FFD2FF2CC041D2AE1916A4639@DB9PR06MB8843.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5968 bytes --]

The article about the ASCEND project says:
"Very low ambient temperatures in space will dramatically reduce the need
for cooling equipment that consumes enormous amounts of energy. A
significant part of a data center’s energy use is for cooling equipment,
accounting for more than 50% in some facilities. Temperatures can be as low
as -292°F (-180°C) when an orbiting object is in the Earth’s shadow."

Hesham

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023, 10:44 PM Daniel Schien <Daniel.Schien@bristol.ac.uk>
wrote:

> I assume any object in orbit will be hidden from the sun some of the time.
> So, the machines will require some pretty big battery to go up with them.
>
> I'd like to also know what the launch cost is.
>
> Tom Segert estimates in his LinkedIn post, for a 100kg satellite payload:
>
> "TL:DR ~57 ton CO2e for a typical ESA satellite (including Ariane 6
> launch), <15t CO2e for a satellite built in a factory and launched with a
> re-usable rocket."
>
> Depending on the type of server that should go up there, this is a fair
> amount of carbon to offset from brighter sunlight.
>
> The article also gets the carbon footprint wrong:
>
> "Data centers are big energy consumers – between 2% and 3% of all global
> consumption – a rate that is doubling every year."
>
> The latest was IEA estimating it to be around 220-320 TWh (out of 30,000)
> in 2021 data and growing between 10-60% over 6 years in total (so let's
> than 10 CAGR). But it's certainly not doubling every year. That's just
> completely wrong.
>
>
> Daniel Schien
>
> Senior Lecturer in Computer Science
>
> Department of Computer Science | University of Bristol
>
> *Submit software engineering project ideas for 2022*
>
> bris.ac.uk/software-engineering
> Watch: https://youtu.be/lU-ZsBDFWDI
>
> Merchant Venturers Building , Woodland Rd Bristol, BS8 1UB
> *Book a meeting*:
> https://outlook.office365.com/owa/calendar/OfficeHours@bristol.ac.uk/booki
> <https://outlook.office365.com/owa/calendar/OfficeHours@bristol.ac.uk/bookings/>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* E-impact <e-impact-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Vint Cerf <vint=
> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:16:38 AM
> *To:* tom@evslin.com <tom@evslin.com>
> *Cc:* Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>; starlink <
> starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>; e-impact@ietf.org <e-impact@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [E-impact] [Starlink] DataCenters in Space (was Re: fiber
> IXPs in space)
>
> O&M will be a bear
> v
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:13 PM Tom Evslin via Starlink <
> starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> I think space-based data centers will be the rule rather than the
> exception. Wrote about that a couple of years ago although, as usual,
> things have not happened as quickly as I predicted
> https://blog.tomevslin.com/2021/07/computing-clouds-in-orbit-a-possible-roadmap.html
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Starlink <starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> On Behalf Of
> Michael Richardson via Starlink
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2023 7:35 PM
> To: starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>; e-impact@ietf.org
> Subject: [Starlink] DataCenters in Space (was Re: fiber IXPs in space)
>
>
> I saw this reported in BIS-Spaceflight.
> (I'm usually a few months behind in reading it) I like the "first
> objective"!
>
>
> https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/worldwide/space/press-release/ascend-thales-alenia-space-lead-european-feasibility-study-data
>
> Cannes, November 14, 2022 – Thales Alenia Space, the joint company between
> Thales (67%) and Leonardo (33%), has been chosen by the European Commission
> to lead the ASCEND (Advanced Space Cloud for European Net zero emission and
> Data sovereignty) feasibility study for data centers in orbit, as part of
> Europe’s vast Horizon Europe research program.
>
> Digital technology’s expanding environmental footprint is becoming a major
> challenge: the burgeoning need for digitalization means that data centers
> in Europe and around the world are growing at an exponential pace, which in
> turn has a critical energy and environmental impact.
>
> The first objective of this study will be to assess if the carbon
> emissions from the production and launch of these space infrastructures
> will be significantly lower than the emissions generated by ground-based
> data centers, therefore contributing to the achievement of global carbon
> neutrality. The second objective will be to prove that it is possible to
> develop the required launch solution and to ensure the deployment and
> operability of these spaceborne data centers using robotic assistance
> technologies currently being developed in Europe, such as the EROSS IOD
> demonstrator.
>
> This project is expected to demonstrate to which extent space-based data
> centers would limit the energy and environmental impact of their ground
> counterparts, thus allowing major investments within the scope of Europe’s
> Green Deal, possibly justifying the development of a more climate-friendly,
> reusable heavy launch vehicle. Europe could thus regain its leadership in
> space transport and space logistics, as well as the assembly and operations
> of large infrastructures in orbit.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
>
>
> --
> Please send any postal/overnight deliveries to:
> Vint Cerf
> Google, LLC
> 1900 Reston Metro Plaza, 16th Floor
> Reston, VA 20190
> +1 (571) 213 1346
>
>
> until further notice
>
>
>
> --
> E-impact mailing list
> E-impact@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e-impact
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12316 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-20 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-13 16:34 [Starlink] fiber IXPs in space David Fernández
2023-04-13 17:22 ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-13 18:54   ` David Fernández
2023-04-13 20:01     ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-13 20:06       ` Tom Evslin
2023-04-19 23:34       ` [Starlink] DataCenters in Space (was Re: fiber IXPs in space) Michael Richardson
2023-04-20  1:12         ` tom
2023-04-20  1:16           ` Vint Cerf
     [not found]             ` <ZECsG+Ldro3V5+/4@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
2023-04-20  3:25               ` [Starlink] [E-impact] " Hesham ElBakoury
2023-04-20  5:43             ` Daniel Schien
2023-04-20  9:31               ` Chris Adams
2023-04-20 12:50                 ` Hesham ElBakoury
2023-04-20 12:51                   ` Hesham ElBakoury
2023-04-27  3:13                 ` Eugene Y Chang
2023-04-20 11:10               ` Hesham ElBakoury [this message]
2023-04-20 11:23                 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-04-20 11:24                 ` David Lang
2023-04-20 12:06                 ` Dave Collier-Brown
2023-04-20 21:21                   ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-04-20 12:14                 ` tom
2023-04-20 14:36                 ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-20 14:18               ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-27  3:50               ` David Lang
2023-04-20 11:25             ` [Starlink] " Hesham ElBakoury
2023-04-20 11:27               ` Nathan Owens
2023-04-20 11:34                 ` Mike Puchol
2023-04-20 14:21                   ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-20  4:33           ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-04-20 14:12             ` Michael Richardson
     [not found] <mailman.128.1682362805.60209.e-impact@ietf.org>
2023-04-24 20:59 ` [Starlink] [E-impact] " Priyanka Sinha
2023-04-27  3:18   ` Eugene Chang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFvDQ9rDML2NGD09=mOTJ_g34obP+3_oz=z+NQUyxQCgUgHGeQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=helbakoury@gmail.com \
    --cc=Daniel.Schien@bristol.ac.uk \
    --cc=e-impact@ietf.org \
    --cc=mcr@sandelman.ca \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=tom@evslin.com \
    --cc=vint=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox