From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5244C3CB35 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 11:17:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id d7so9560759pgc.13 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 08:17:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ookla.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sm3k/ctVA+BKYV/t1K+7dn2jvwWNyIPhQ+kwfeQmNlA=; b=jSueE6nhV3EGPjOcUb1Om/6DmzKXHnaqnoUvylY+tLogUIQ1F/TH5MUj7A2Db+nZxe hFKZo+mG24J/1QW2l6JW1/72bq9H+g7fRZEC5lQDm6SnjDXVUp2/31lRLCm58xi480Bo K4x4Txpf7DgswfpFiIEIylrxxomYfOWpPbhhNtAD2I72uFtbF0T0cI9L4Zf1F5PeR4Xn pVQspnpFZXBuvipaGJ4R+4Ucq575CW35MJhZbL0fPd2RetcKDlh++Y8fY3fIXVyvj6l9 +GlNjaV8ZSM1+lx5sS1Gici0vIcsTpZBXXeI0OsMPbT2aRYipgLlgdqxVFS6JTxHmHQ3 6y3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sm3k/ctVA+BKYV/t1K+7dn2jvwWNyIPhQ+kwfeQmNlA=; b=57S/9Af5X39VgRFraa/i2/0zyTTjjACHnhjsPiBx4B2EyoYFSdi0bjQMkj5VFeVvNk I5XEY/DBjBTugIdRHdGbix1QBubwrG+LxOi8IXw9J3VUgPyoIR89iZfc+WZYK6b+uwMu 6bZkVt7I8DcPGDs+A/Ch//GV5SEajOXqKQxFcYgY1UklveXxoMSHEhYjCym0h29rLQ3i C6M/oS6cfGha+o5MZcS8yqV2zV2R9g20PzNlVXfvLdp+z4BX/lSOhnrzdINJRbYPsWhX n/CeeJaHHgA7Kobi4kTHjXgx+e88geRi/tGsDECs6mG8C9fhJcxJIrtJPniiyJHs5U0S mbIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3/HEc+qlkxght2LDlDFrsr+fr+2YuExm+k1BWv36L9FVRYXTKz BaPjiFz3glWsqtByFep7SPV5W55gaA60Q0O/weytI9hjHDWfiSzbeFZ0EmKJQD0dJu7jwf6D5Mr HVKT90g1VnUXWEfWJ8Q+TW4V2oSA0r20Olx8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7+UaQ28cXqR+668eL7c0PyLajeo23Qys/192GcMfNmTPt79RL3jttypZiMnS/W93Mx+BDHwWxw7Iw0RmpxXHQ= X-Received: by 2002:a63:1e4e:0:b0:41c:8e48:9807 with SMTP id p14-20020a631e4e000000b0041c8e489807mr269146pgm.247.1659453446198; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 08:17:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Brennen Smith Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 08:17:15 -0700 Message-ID: To: Dave Taht Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink , Rpm Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002ec10005e5439d16" Subject: Re: [Starlink] LUL 220ms flat over starlink X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 15:17:28 -0000 --0000000000002ec10005e5439d16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Compared to GEO Sat links, this is very reasonable latency and distance. Either GeoIP is wrong, or they=E2=80=99re starting to balance within the me= sh for capacity. If you look very closely at the maritime announcement - they=E2= =80=99re right on schedule for the latter. On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 07:41 Dave Taht wrote: > It is my guess over a path this (inaccurately selected? lasered?) > long, the new speedtest doesn't saturate the link. > > https://twitter.com/olegkutkov/status/1554404854763819008 > > -- > FQ World Domination pending: > https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/ > Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC > --=20 Brennen Smith VP Technology (206) 739-0807 | brennen@ookla.com linkedin.com/in/brennensmith --=20 This email, its contents and attachments contain information from Ziff=20 Davis, Inc. and/or its affiliates which may be privileged, confidential or= =20 otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for= =20 the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure, copy,= =20 distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you= =20 have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email= =20 and delete the original message and any copies. --0000000000002ec10005e5439d16 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Compared to GEO Sat links, this is very reasonable latenc= y and distance.

Either G= eoIP is wrong, or they=E2=80=99re starting to balance within the mesh for c= apacity. If you look very closely at the maritime announcement - they=E2=80= =99re right on schedule for the latter.=C2=A0

On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 07= :41 Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.co= m> wrote:
It is my guess over a path this = (inaccurately selected? lasered?)
long, the new speedtest doesn't saturate the link.

https://twitter.com/olegkutkov/status/155= 4404854763819008

--
FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.or= g/post/state_of_fq_codel/
Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
--

Brennen Smith VP Technology <= /span>

(206) 739-0807 | brennen@ookla.com

linkedin.com/in/brennen= smith



This email, its contents and a= ttachments contain information from Ziff Davis, Inc. and/or its affiliates = which may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosur= e. The information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are = not an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents= of this message is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, p= lease notify the sender by reply email and delete the original message and = any copies.
--0000000000002ec10005e5439d16--