From: J Pan <Pan@uvic.ca>
To: Nitinder Mohan <mohan@in.tum.de>
Cc: "starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Comprehensive Measurement Study on Starlink Performance Published
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:49:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHn=e4g4motowvkWu9iGiZn9VOXc8n=oxRdEzRkV+c-xDYA0aw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <etPan.65dcd4b4.593a6eed.2c4@in.tum.de>
very nice paper and video---we've updated the reference to your work
as well. cheers. -j
--
J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA, Web.UVic.CA/~pan
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:13 AM Nitinder Mohan via Starlink
<starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Our comprehensive multifaceted measurement study looking at Starlink global and last-mile performance is now available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09242.
>
> TL;DR: See the summary in this nice teaser video we made: https://youtu.be/WtE3MoK8J80
>
> We looked at several third-party measurement sources (M-Lab, RIPE Atlas) and performed our own measurements over multiple Starlink dishes to uncover the following:
>
> 1. How different is Starlink network performance globally? How do ground station and PoP availability impact performance?
> 2. How much latency is consumed by the satellite part of the link?
> 3. Is Starlink connection affected by bufferbloat?
> 4. Are satellite handovers the root-cause of Starlink 15-sec reconfigurations?
> 5. How good is Starlink compared to terrestrial cellular networks for real-time applications, specifically Cloud Gaming and Zoom.
>
> The study has been accepted and will appear in ACM The Web Conference 2024 (WWW), which is a flagship venue that has historically housed several pioneering works central to Internet success.
>
> Feel free to let me know if you have any questions related to the work.
>
> P.S. We also thanked this mailing list in our paper for providing us several key insights and inquisitive discussions :)
>
> Thanks and Regards
>
> Nitinder Mohan
> Technical University Munich (TUM)
> https://www.nitindermohan.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-26 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-26 18:12 Nitinder Mohan
2024-02-26 19:49 ` J Pan [this message]
2024-02-26 19:53 ` Dave Taht
2024-02-26 22:19 ` Ulrich Speidel
2024-02-26 23:19 ` David Lang
2024-02-27 0:16 ` Ulrich Speidel
2024-02-27 1:13 ` David Lang
2024-02-27 2:33 ` Ulrich Speidel
2024-02-27 6:21 ` David Lang
2024-02-27 7:31 ` [Starlink] starlink business peering Dave Taht
2024-02-27 7:38 ` David Lang
2024-02-27 7:42 ` Dave Taht
2024-02-27 8:08 ` David Lang
2024-02-27 11:15 ` [Starlink] Comprehensive Measurement Study on Starlink Performance Published Ulrich Speidel
2024-02-27 14:02 ` Nitinder Mohan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHn=e4g4motowvkWu9iGiZn9VOXc8n=oxRdEzRkV+c-xDYA0aw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pan@uvic.ca \
--cc=mohan@in.tum.de \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox