Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: J Pan <Pan@uvic.ca>
To: Oleg Kutkov <contact@olegkutkov.me>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Starlink] Re: Starlink Standby Mode
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 14:20:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHn=e4j1Nsb+PGYXZuqxhRd=BfqHq8EwevZqD5tnuwi6K5BOhQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <048be086-22b8-4c20-9be8-e4f86e620031@olegkutkov.me>

nothing better than free ;-) but it may cost them more than $5/mo to
maintain an active dish. don't they just want to keep as many
revenue-generating customers for an upcoming ipo?
--
J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA, Web.UVic.CA/~pan

On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 2:01 PM Oleg Kutkov via Starlink
<starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> Well. I prefer a good old free pause.
> I have seven Starlink terminals on my account, and I mostly don't use
> them, except for some experiments, occasional tests, firmware dumps, and
> similar purposes.
> Now they will charge me $35 each month for basically nothing.
>
> On 9/9/25 23:14, Luis A. Cornejo via Starlink wrote:
> > There is another electric cooperative in my county that did just that.
> > Strung fiber along the posts, I was not lucky enough to be part of their
> > territory. But from people that I know it’s similar that’s it’s fast but
> > not always reliable, so storms can take some down, often around here it’s
> > also a backhoe, and when it does down, it’s down for a while.
> >
> > But I agree, it’s a great backup. Although it probably costs almost as much
> > to run in electricity as the service itself! =o)
> >
> > -Luis
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:41 PM Colin_Higbie via Starlink <
> > starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >
> >> I find the Standby mode to be a great backup option. $5/mo for unlimited
> >> low-bandwidth usage. This is something I've been urging them to offer for
> >> about a year now.
> >>
> >> About 18 months after I originally purchased and subscribed to Starlink,
> >> our power company (not phone company as you'd expect, really our electric
> >> power company) rolled out fiber to rural communities in northern NH. As
> >> great as Starlink was compared to what we had before, fiber is even better
> >> now that it's available (1Gbps for $79/mo, consistently tests as A on
> >> Bufferbloat). But it's not 100% reliable. For example, when there are
> >> widespread power outages, it goes down. The Starlink standby option is
> >> perfect for those situations.
> >>
> >> Latency remains decent, just limited bandwidth. And if the fiber outage
> >> remains in effect for too long, we could always activate Starlink at full
> >> bandwidth for that month, where it appears they're taking that option away
> >> from people with inactive accounts not already on Standby mode (they may be
> >> bluffing on that – you'd think they would want to make it easy for anyone
> >> to give them money and resubscribe, standby customer or not).
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Colin
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Starlink mailing list -- starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to starlink-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Starlink mailing list -- starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > To unsubscribe send an email to starlink-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Oleg Kutkov
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list -- starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to starlink-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-09 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <175739769285.1561.9299932820839760282@gauss>
2025-09-09 18:41 ` Colin_Higbie
2025-09-09 20:14   ` Luis A. Cornejo
2025-09-09 21:01     ` Oleg Kutkov
2025-09-09 21:20       ` J Pan [this message]
2025-09-10  5:36         ` Ulrich Speidel
2025-09-10  6:00           ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-09-10  7:53           ` David Lang
2025-09-10 10:24             ` Ulrich Speidel
2025-09-10 16:01               ` J Pan
2025-09-08 21:34 [Starlink] " Luis A. Cornejo
2025-09-09  5:35 ` [Starlink] " J Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHn=e4j1Nsb+PGYXZuqxhRd=BfqHq8EwevZqD5tnuwi6K5BOhQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=pan@uvic.ca \
    --cc=contact@olegkutkov.me \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox