From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yb1-f180.google.com (mail-yb1-f180.google.com [209.85.219.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 259593CB37 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 20:09:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-yb1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dfa7faffa6cso3557807276.0 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 17:09:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717459739; x=1718064539; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wwHV2JFB3yHmY+kCMvRpbTxbC4WphwNM3bdhkgEyaVo=; b=ki8I3QnapuugaDNlnYP9Cjz13Ur+rVKFQzuLNg7QPG0fMtwwh54WMuq2L2Gh02lLr7 cIF5ntEDLvgRPUdVehDW/z+0ge3uJbdEeQKuADE9G+OC7HnfxGBtVAMywliIk8DKXAor gRsoNIuh3R8OqGCec0QWMghu8c7krGbHZx6gtvQ8qZE5SORCFlIo7vwzu7rtr3wlNwoA 5400k1SPxNTRJsH2BSFnx4wfqE76bhtQhZW/3HqsTD45Knw8IgzqqhNBnsxQiwgTHBdr 4/G+bUJfT4AQ/QvAKzbbtLDR4RdemAuHPdkAtK/0/glZaHSq8g7W04bQrTG73OCnalXf votw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz4/nJ2uD1CciUaPePe98QEifLyzSOEWEsdmWoFVQbFXvBBtdO3 /IJNN4YbGUnCvbEml49nay8x1Oq9TpvXWV5KCRYrdO91nvDJCC8NCgrTdMXmOPPEinUiSCUVc4S FuI+J6+unE9DWciarMCDVly4ySX653jgQ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGIf5nh/85QE6cKWPXB9oIy53lO3XZ+T1vNmb9QajtM2jw+F85TGGeuqjV50ZQ4Hem5yaNUJv9QCQrET9hHmT8= X-Received: by 2002:a25:bc45:0:b0:df1:d115:5e72 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dfa73c43cf9mr10799941276.30.1717459739430; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 17:08:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: J Pan Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 17:08:48 -0700 Message-ID: To: Dave Taht Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Starlink] musk: 28ms median latency on starlink X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:09:00 -0000 it's better if elon can show the distribution of the ut-pop latency, as median (or p50) does not tell anything about p99 as shown in https://api.starlink.com/public-files/StarlinkLatency.pdf -- J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA, Web.UVic.CA/~pa= n On Sun, Jun 2, 2024 at 10:13=E2=80=AFAM Dave Taht via Starlink wrote: > > Via elon musk: > > Starlink just achieved a new internal median latency record of 28ms yeste= rday! Great work by the engineering and operations teams. > > - https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1797282250574184587 > > I of course, am very interested in y'all=C2=B4s external measurements of = how well starlink is doing. For me, it is fantastic - 30Mbit uploads nowada= ys, 0 > latency on the upload (how?) https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?t= est-id=3D2a1d139b-87cb-4ba4-a829-e2167801cffe > > I also keep hoping that the rest of the ISP industry is now paying attent= ion and deploying stuff like fq_codel and cake and libreqos, but, ah well -= I will settle for starlink blowing past a lot of dsl and cable and finding= ways to get their density up. > > Anyone going to the Starship launch on the 6th? > > > > -- > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DBVFWSyMp3xg&t=3D1098s Waves Podcast > Dave T=C3=A4ht CSO, LibreQos > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink