From: Jonathan Bennett <jonathanbennett@hackaday.com>
To: Nathan Owens <nathan@nathan.io>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] something of a step backwards
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 12:14:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHtUBugvDXJ+=h22P=resygiND4-C9tstJz_QHbNReGTB=XQmw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALjsLJtw0=F+ttoAPi=kBDp9rVrfvaPK4zZ=3a4W5_8dkoYCoQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1400 bytes --]
They are putting the PoE supply in the router -- no more power brick. I
suppose it's too much to hope that they cut power draw enough to use
standardized PoE++ equipment. They do offer an add-on Ethernet adapter, and
have promised a bridged mode. That at least gets us back to the
functionality we have now.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021, 9:55 AM Nathan Owens <nathan@nathan.io> wrote:
> My guess is they moved the "smarts" from the dish to the router, so no net
> change.
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 7:54 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The new "squary" doesn't let you use your own router. Sigh. There is
>> so much more you can do with control of your own firewall and
>> router...
>>
>> https://twitter.com/awlnx/status/1458786406722121742
>>
>> sure hope they got all the bufferbloat-fighting algos in the uplink,
>> wifi, and ethernet, in there, and ipv6 support.
>>
>> --
>> I tried to build a better future, a few times:
>> https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
>>
>> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2665 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-11 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-11 15:53 Dave Taht
2021-11-11 15:54 ` Nathan Owens
2021-11-11 18:14 ` Jonathan Bennett [this message]
[not found] <mailman.5.1636650001.22273.starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2021-11-11 18:30 ` David P. Reed
2021-11-15 14:21 ` Livingood, Jason
2021-11-15 18:45 ` David P. Reed
2021-11-15 22:36 ` Michael Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHtUBugvDXJ+=h22P=resygiND4-C9tstJz_QHbNReGTB=XQmw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jonathanbennett@hackaday.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=nathan@nathan.io \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox