From: Jonathan Bennett <jonathanbennett@hackaday.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] insanely great waveform result for starlink
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 22:26:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHtUBuhwDywnq2p77L-oyc0J=M8W9PB98f3Vi3JqOuqe+nvuQw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5eobJAo7eROdtZiJu=bwm0OrEvZzOvNqcBLjA_d3damw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2766 bytes --]
Just ran a Waveform test, and ping times are still terrible while maxing
out download speeds. Upload saturation doesn't seem to affect latency,
though. Also interesting, it's giving me a valid ipv6 block again.
[image: image.png]
[image: image.png]
Jonathan Bennett
Hackaday.com
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:08 PM Dave Taht via Starlink <
starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> has anyone been testing theirs this week?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 7:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets
> cloudflare'schristmas present
> To: MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com>
> Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Jay Moran <jay@tp.org>, Cake List
> <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, Rpm
> <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
> dickroy@alum.mit.edu <dickroy@alum.mit.edu>, libreqos
> <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>
>
> Well Reddit has many posts talking about noticeable performance
> increases for Starlink. Here is a primetime run:
>
> waveform:
>
> https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=333f97c7-7cbd-406c-8d9a-9f850cb5de7d
>
> cloudflare attached
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:43 AM MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dave and Luis,
> >
> > Do you know if any of these tools are using ~random payloads, to defeat
> compression?
> >
> > UDPST has a CLI option:
> > (m) -X Randomize datagram payload (else zeroes)
> >
> > When I used this option testing shipboard satellite access, download was
> about 115kbps.
> >
> > Al
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 11:12 AM
> > > To: Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Jay Moran <jay@tp.org>; Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
> IETF IPPM
> > > WG <ippm@ietf.org>; MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com>; Rpm
> > > <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>; bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
> > > dickroy@alum.mit.edu; libreqos <libreqos@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> > > Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets
> > > cloudflare'schristmas present
> > >
> > > Either starlink has vastly improved, or the test is way off in this
> case.
>
>
>
> --
> This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5499 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: image.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 235280 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: image.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 298232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-13 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-04 17:26 [Starlink] the grinch meets cloudflare's christmas present Dave Taht
2023-01-04 19:20 ` [Starlink] [Rpm] " jf
2023-01-04 20:02 ` rjmcmahon
2023-01-04 21:16 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-01-04 23:54 ` Bruce Perens
2023-01-05 2:48 ` Dave Collier-Brown
2023-01-05 3:11 ` Dick Roy
2023-01-05 11:25 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-01-06 0:01 ` Dick Roy
2023-01-06 9:43 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-01-05 6:11 ` rjmcmahon
2023-01-05 11:11 ` [Starlink] [Bloat] " Sebastian Moeller
2023-01-06 16:38 ` [Starlink] [LibreQoS] " MORTON JR., AL
2023-01-06 20:38 ` [Starlink] [Rpm] " rjmcmahon
2023-01-06 20:47 ` rjmcmahon
[not found] ` <89D796E75967416B9723211C183A8396@SRA6>
[not found] ` <a082b2436e6ba7892d2de8e0dfcc5acd@rjmcmahon.com>
[not found] ` <3696AEA5409D4303ABCBC439727A5E40@SRA6>
[not found] ` <CAKJdXWBb0VxSSoGAQTe3BXFLXCHd6NSspRnXd1frK2f66SLiUw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAA93jw6B_9-WE9EEFuac+FAH-2dcULk=_3i_HfhCSVSOxyM7Eg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CA+Ld8r8hR8KF35Yv7A3hb1QvC9v9ka2Nh2J=HEm0XhPfvAAcag@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAKJdXWC+aEy1b3vB-FFd+tnfT+Ni5O9bZ+p4kkhj-FzMPVGGcQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAA93jw4DcBhA8CevRQoMbzjO-3Jt+emr+xvnJ-hUGkT+n0KJzg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CH0PR02MB79800FF2E40CE037D6802D71D3FD9@CH0PR02MB7980.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
[not found] ` <CAKJdXWDOFbzsam2C_24e9DLkc18ed4uhV51hOKVjDipk1Uhc2g@mail.gmail.com>
2023-01-13 4:08 ` [Starlink] insanely great waveform result for starlink Dave Taht
2023-01-13 4:26 ` Jonathan Bennett [this message]
2023-01-13 5:13 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-01-13 5:25 ` Dave Taht
2023-01-13 12:27 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-01-13 17:02 ` Jonathan Bennett
2023-01-13 17:26 ` Dave Taht
2023-01-13 17:41 ` Jonathan Bennett
2023-01-13 18:09 ` Nathan Owens
2023-01-13 20:30 ` Nathan Owens
2023-01-13 20:37 ` Dave Taht
2023-01-13 21:24 ` Nathan Owens
2023-01-13 20:49 ` Dave Taht
2023-01-13 21:25 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-13 21:30 ` Nathan Owens
2023-01-13 22:09 ` Jonathan Bennett
2023-01-13 22:30 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-13 22:32 ` Dave Taht
2023-01-13 22:36 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-01-13 22:42 ` Jonathan Bennett
2023-01-13 22:49 ` Dave Taht
2023-01-13 23:44 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <CALjsLJv5cbfHfkxqHnbjxoVHczspYvxc_jrshzs1CpHLEDWyew@mail.gmail.com>
2023-01-14 14:20 ` Nathan Owens
2023-01-14 15:53 ` Dave Taht
2023-01-14 16:33 ` Dave Taht
2023-01-14 15:52 ` Dave Taht
2023-01-13 20:25 ` Pat Jensen
2023-01-13 20:40 ` Dave Taht
2023-01-13 22:51 ` Ulrich Speidel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHtUBuhwDywnq2p77L-oyc0J=M8W9PB98f3Vi3JqOuqe+nvuQw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jonathanbennett@hackaday.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox