From: Inemesit Affia <inemesitaffia@gmail.com>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink tidbits from NANOG
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 19:25:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJEhh70AaEHj5XafYoEWYukKjKV+omHcKZw8AeMnROdL02zhdA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <172619.1636049781@dooku>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1353 bytes --]
Waves are a unit of optical transport. Similar to PON, you can get several
wavelengths on the same fiber and sell them to different users, Split them
at both ends. Thats the whole 'point of DWDM. It's not just faster speeds
or less cable
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 7:16 PM Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>
> Thanks for bringing us this view..
>
> Darrell Budic <budic@onholyground.com> wrote:
> > - v6 is deliberately
> > not fully functional, but they know some of use are using it and it
> > will eventually be fully activated. May be waiting on the regional
> > connectivity, so will be intersting to see if changes for some areas
> > and not others as they roll it out.
>
> Even if they used IPv6 for the "last mile" and ran NAT64, that would still
> be
> a major improvement over trying to run dual stack. That's what the
> smarter
> mobile operators are already doing. (jio, some US carriers...)
>
> --
> ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh
> networks [
> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network
> architect [
> ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on
> rails [
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2133 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-04 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-04 15:26 Darrell Budic
2021-11-04 16:21 ` Dave Taht
2021-11-04 16:46 ` Dave Taht
2021-11-04 17:11 ` Dave Taht
2021-11-05 1:30 ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-05 1:41 ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-05 1:46 ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-04 18:16 ` Michael Richardson
2021-11-04 18:25 ` Inemesit Affia [this message]
2021-11-04 18:29 ` Dave Taht
2021-11-04 19:10 ` Michael Richardson
2021-11-05 0:34 ` Ulrich Speidel
2021-11-05 1:05 ` Nathan Owens
2021-11-05 1:18 ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-05 22:24 ` Ulrich Speidel
2021-11-05 15:00 ` [Starlink] data sovereignty Michael Richardson
2021-11-05 15:07 ` Spencer Sevilla
2021-11-05 17:36 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2021-11-05 18:01 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2021-11-05 22:12 ` [Starlink] Starlink tidbits from NANOG Ulrich Speidel
2021-11-05 1:27 ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-05 15:03 ` Michael Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJEhh70AaEHj5XafYoEWYukKjKV+omHcKZw8AeMnROdL02zhdA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=inemesitaffia@gmail.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox